Rural healthcare providers’ attitudes on climate change in the Northwestern US

INTRODUCTION: Climate change is a growing source of concern for rural public health. Despite rural healthcare providers' vital roles in promoting community resilience, their views on climate change and its impacts on their patients' health are not well understood. METHODS: Using a 38-question online survey, we collected opinion data from rural providers in five states in the Northwestern US, aiming to understand the multifaceted perceptions rural providers have of climate change and its patient-level impacts. Data were aggregated and stratified by variables of interest. Broad trends and effects from demographic variables were modeled using ANOVA analyses and graphical representations, as well as a random forest model. RESULTS: A total of 115 providers responded to the survey (seven were dropped per exclusion criteria) with comparable populations across several states, age groups, and professions. Nearly all providers believed that climate change is occurring, and most felt that it is impacting patients' health, yet many were unsure of their ability to integrate climate consciousness into clinical practice. Interest in the clinical relevance of climate change was best explained by provider political affiliation and education level. Random forest modeling also suggested effects due to age, tenure, and state of residence, which were masked by confounding factors in the other models. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that some providers struggle to make connections between changes in climate and community health outcomes, while others lack the resources and preparation to integrate what they do know into clinical practice. Bridging this gap will likely require institutional investment in continuing education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural and Remote Health
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22605/rrh10911
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rural healthcare providers’ attitudes on climate change in the Northwestern US

Johnson, Knouff, Pettigrew, Keys et al.
Rural and Remote Health
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Rural healthcare providers’ attitudes on climate change in the Northwestern US

Johnson, Knouff, Pettigrew, Keys, Eckman, Crawford, Williams
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Climate change is a growing source of concern for rural public health. Despite rural healthcare providers' vital roles in promoting community resilience, their views on climate change and its impacts on their patients' health are not well understood. METHODS: Using a 38-question online survey, we collected opinion data from rural providers in five states in the Northwestern US, aiming to understand the multifaceted perceptions rural providers have of climate change and its patient-level impacts. Data were aggregated and stratified by variables of interest. Broad trends and effects from demographic variables were modeled using ANOVA analyses and graphical representations, as well as a random forest model. RESULTS: A total of 115 providers responded to the survey (seven were dropped per exclusion criteria) with comparable populations across several states, age groups, and professions. Nearly all providers believed that climate change is occurring, and most felt that it is impacting patients' health, yet many were unsure of their ability to integrate climate consciousness into clinical practice. Interest in the clinical relevance of climate change was best explained by provider political affiliation and education level. Random forest modeling also suggested effects due to age, tenure, and state of residence, which were masked by confounding factors in the other models. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that some providers struggle to make connections between changes in climate and community health outcomes, while others lack the resources and preparation to integrate what they do know into clinical practice. Bridging this gap will likely require institutional investment in continuing education.

Rural and Remote HealthVol. 26(3)
University of Washington (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.