Regular AREDS2 Supplement Use in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Factors Associated with Supplementation, Medication Adherence, and Patient-Reported Barriers

Background/Objectives: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible visual impairment, and AREDS2-based nutritional supplementation is recommended for clinically eligible patients to reduce the risk of disease progression. However, successful implementation depends on regular supplement use and sustained adherence. This study investigated demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and physician-related factors associated with regular AREDS2 supplement use and evaluated medication adherence, physician counseling, and patient-reported barriers among clinically eligible patients with AMD. Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, 389 patients with intermediate AMD or advanced AMD in one eye who fulfilled the indications for AREDS2 supplementation were enrolled. Participants reporting occasional supplement use were excluded. A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical data, together with information on physician recommendation, medication adherence, patient knowledge, and perceived barriers to supplementation. Factors associated with regular AREDS2 supplement use were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, whereas adherence patterns and patient-reported barriers were analyzed descriptively. Results: Of the 389 participants, 273 (70.2%) reported regular AREDS2 supplement use, whereas 116 (29.8%) were non-users. Multivariable analysis showed that younger age, educational attainment, and physician recommendation were independently associated with regular supplement use (adjusted OR for physician recommendation, 5.38; 95% CI, 2.68–10.81; p < 0.001). Among regular users, 53.5% met the study-defined criteria for good medication adherence. The most frequently reported barriers among non-users were financial burden, limited supplement availability, polypharmacy, and insufficient knowledge regarding AREDS2 supplementation. Conclusions: Regular AREDS2 supplement use among clinically eligible patients with AMD was associated with demographic, educational, and physician-related factors, whereas long-term adherence remained suboptimal despite substantial uptake. These findings emphasize the importance of effective physician counseling, structured patient education, and interventions addressing socioeconomic barriers to improve the real-world implementation of evidence-based nutritional supplementation in AMD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14172733
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regular AREDS2 Supplement Use in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Factors Associated with Supplementation, Medication Adherence, and Patient-Reported Barriers

Umut Dağ, Mehmet Fuat Alakuş, Hasan Öncül
Healthcare
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Regular AREDS2 Supplement Use in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Factors Associated with Supplementation, Medication Adherence, and Patient-Reported Barriers

Umut Dağ, Mehmet Fuat Alakuş, Hasan Öncül
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible visual impairment, and AREDS2-based nutritional supplementation is recommended for clinically eligible patients to reduce the risk of disease progression. However, successful implementation depends on regular supplement use and sustained adherence. This study investigated demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and physician-related factors associated with regular AREDS2 supplement use and evaluated medication adherence, physician counseling, and patient-reported barriers among clinically eligible patients with AMD. Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, 389 patients with intermediate AMD or advanced AMD in one eye who fulfilled the indications for AREDS2 supplementation were enrolled. Participants reporting occasional supplement use were excluded. A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical data, together with information on physician recommendation, medication adherence, patient knowledge, and perceived barriers to supplementation. Factors associated with regular AREDS2 supplement use were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, whereas adherence patterns and patient-reported barriers were analyzed descriptively. Results: Of the 389 participants, 273 (70.2%) reported regular AREDS2 supplement use, whereas 116 (29.8%) were non-users. Multivariable analysis showed that younger age, educational attainment, and physician recommendation were independently associated with regular supplement use (adjusted OR for physician recommendation, 5.38; 95% CI, 2.68–10.81; p < 0.001). Among regular users, 53.5% met the study-defined criteria for good medication adherence. The most frequently reported barriers among non-users were financial burden, limited supplement availability, polypharmacy, and insufficient knowledge regarding AREDS2 supplementation. Conclusions: Regular AREDS2 supplement use among clinically eligible patients with AMD was associated with demographic, educational, and physician-related factors, whereas long-term adherence remained suboptimal despite substantial uptake. These findings emphasize the importance of effective physician counseling, structured patient education, and interventions addressing socioeconomic barriers to improve the real-world implementation of evidence-based nutritional supplementation in AMD.

HealthcareVol. 14(17)
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.