The skill premium across countries in the era of industrial robots and artificial intelligence

How do new technologies affect economic growth and the skill premium? To answer this question, we analyze the impacts of industrial robots and artificial intelligence (AI) across 52 countries using counterfactual simulations. In so doing, we simulate the nested CES production function framework of Bloom et al. (2025) with low-skilled workers, high-skilled workers, traditional capital, robots, and AI. Our contribution lies in documenting substantial heterogeneity across income groups: the inequality-increasing effect of robots and the inequality-reducing effect of AI are particularly strong in high-income countries, while they are less pronounced among upper-middle and lower-middle income countries. In addition, we show that both technologies boost economic growth. In terms of policy recommendations, our framework suggests i) balanced investment in both types of automation technologies to increase economic growth while keeping wage inequality subdued, and ii) investments in education and skill-upgrading to mitigate negative effects of robot use on wage inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Development
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107538
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The skill premium across countries in the era of industrial robots and artificial intelligence

Klaus Prettner, Marcos J. Ribeiro
World Development
Economic and Technological Innovation
article

The skill premium across countries in the era of industrial robots and artificial intelligence

Klaus Prettner, Marcos J. Ribeiro
article en

Abstract

How do new technologies affect economic growth and the skill premium? To answer this question, we analyze the impacts of industrial robots and artificial intelligence (AI) across 52 countries using counterfactual simulations. In so doing, we simulate the nested CES production function framework of Bloom et al. (2025) with low-skilled workers, high-skilled workers, traditional capital, robots, and AI. Our contribution lies in documenting substantial heterogeneity across income groups: the inequality-increasing effect of robots and the inequality-reducing effect of AI are particularly strong in high-income countries, while they are less pronounced among upper-middle and lower-middle income countries. In addition, we show that both technologies boost economic growth. In terms of policy recommendations, our framework suggests i) balanced investment in both types of automation technologies to increase economic growth while keeping wage inequality subdued, and ii) investments in education and skill-upgrading to mitigate negative effects of robot use on wage inequality.

World DevelopmentVol. 208
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Fundace (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Technological Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.