A data-driven single substitution to overcome bias from conventional single substitution for LOD missingness in covariates in least squares regression

The Limit of Detection (LOD) is the threshold below which a measurement is considered too low to be reliably quantified. Even though advanced statistical methods exist for dealing with the values below the LOD, simple approaches are still frequently used in real-world settings. Common methods include complete-case analysis, which must use a reduced sample size, and single substitution using fixed constants (e.g. LOD/√2) or other alternatives, which can introduce bias. We propose a data-driven single substitution method for addressing LOD-related missingness in covariates in least squares regression analyses. Instead of relying on constants determined by LODs, our approach computes substitution values based on both unbiased estimates of outcome values associated with the LOD-missing covariates and the linear relationship assumed in the least squares framework. To facilitate hypothesis testing of association effects, we incorporate a bootstrap-based variance estimation procedure. Our simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed method yields unbiased estimates compared to conventional single substitution, achieves lower mean squared errors than the complete-case approach, and provides greater statistical power to detect associations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Statistics
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2026.2717994
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A data-driven single substitution to overcome bias from conventional single substitution for LOD missingness in covariates in least squares regression

Laurie G. Hudson, Ruofei Du, Ji‐Hyun Lee, Xinmin Chu et al.
Journal of Applied Statistics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

A data-driven single substitution to overcome bias from conventional single substitution for LOD missingness in covariates in least squares regression

Laurie G. Hudson, Ruofei Du, Ji‐Hyun Lee, Xinmin Chu, Jing Jin, Debra MacKenzie, Johnnye Lewis, Li Luo
article en

Abstract

The Limit of Detection (LOD) is the threshold below which a measurement is considered too low to be reliably quantified. Even though advanced statistical methods exist for dealing with the values below the LOD, simple approaches are still frequently used in real-world settings. Common methods include complete-case analysis, which must use a reduced sample size, and single substitution using fixed constants (e.g. LOD/√2) or other alternatives, which can introduce bias. We propose a data-driven single substitution method for addressing LOD-related missingness in covariates in least squares regression analyses. Instead of relying on constants determined by LODs, our approach computes substitution values based on both unbiased estimates of outcome values associated with the LOD-missing covariates and the linear relationship assumed in the least squares framework. To facilitate hypothesis testing of association effects, we incorporate a bootstrap-based variance estimation procedure. Our simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed method yields unbiased estimates compared to conventional single substitution, achieves lower mean squared errors than the complete-case approach, and provides greater statistical power to detect associations.

Journal of Applied Statistics
University of New Mexico (US), University of Florida Health (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), UF Health Cancer Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
National Institutes of Health, Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Native American Research Centers for Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.