Biostimulants‐driven improvements in productivity, resource use efficiency and protein yield in pea–barley intercrops

Abstract Biostimulants promote plant growth, nutrient uptake, and drought tolerance, reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers. Intercropping, involving multiple crop species on the same land, is a promising practice. In Denmark, pea ( Pisum sativum )–barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) intercrop (PBIC) is commonly used for grain and fodder production. Our study aimed to assess the effects of biostimulants on productivity, weed biomass, and protein content in PBIC versus sole crops. The grain yield was significantly different between pea sole, barley sole, and PBIC and highest in PBIC. Grain yield in PBIC was 21.42% and 85.93% more compared to barley sole and pea sole, respectively. PBIC recorded higher land equivalent ratio (LER) for grain yield. PBIC recorded highest aboveground dry biomass yield compared to sole crops. The PBIC recorded lower weed incidence than sole crops with reductions of 6.47% and 39.88% compared to the barley sole and pea sole, respectively. Among the biostimulant applications, compost tea yielded highest grain yield (56.95% more than control), and aboveground dry biomass (41.14% more than control) recorded lowest weed biomass (14.67% less than control) under the PBIC system. The highest LER was recorded in high fungal: bacterial compost (2.56) compared to control treatment without biostimulant (1.30). Our results showed higher protein content in barley intercropping grain and straw compared to the barley sole cropping system. Results showed that combining biostimulants in pea–barley intercropping enhances productivity for sustainable temperate farming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70435
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biostimulants‐driven improvements in productivity, resource use efficiency and protein yield in pea–barley intercrops

Bhim Bahadur Ghaley, Saad Mir, Vaibhav Chaudhary
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
article

Biostimulants‐driven improvements in productivity, resource use efficiency and protein yield in pea–barley intercrops

Bhim Bahadur Ghaley, Saad Mir, Vaibhav Chaudhary
article en

Abstract

Abstract Biostimulants promote plant growth, nutrient uptake, and drought tolerance, reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers. Intercropping, involving multiple crop species on the same land, is a promising practice. In Denmark, pea ( Pisum sativum )–barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) intercrop (PBIC) is commonly used for grain and fodder production. Our study aimed to assess the effects of biostimulants on productivity, weed biomass, and protein content in PBIC versus sole crops. The grain yield was significantly different between pea sole, barley sole, and PBIC and highest in PBIC. Grain yield in PBIC was 21.42% and 85.93% more compared to barley sole and pea sole, respectively. PBIC recorded higher land equivalent ratio (LER) for grain yield. PBIC recorded highest aboveground dry biomass yield compared to sole crops. The PBIC recorded lower weed incidence than sole crops with reductions of 6.47% and 39.88% compared to the barley sole and pea sole, respectively. Among the biostimulant applications, compost tea yielded highest grain yield (56.95% more than control), and aboveground dry biomass (41.14% more than control) recorded lowest weed biomass (14.67% less than control) under the PBIC system. The highest LER was recorded in high fungal: bacterial compost (2.56) compared to control treatment without biostimulant (1.30). Our results showed higher protein content in barley intercropping grain and straw compared to the barley sole cropping system. Results showed that combining biostimulants in pea–barley intercropping enhances productivity for sustainable temperate farming.

Agrosystems Geosciences & EnvironmentVol. 9(3)
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.