Biological Control and Biological Security

This policy research article examines biological control as both a resilience instrument and a purposeful ecological intervention within contemporary biosecurity and health-security governance. As biological risks increasingly intersect with food-system stability, ecosystem integrity, biotechnology, supply-chain integrity, and transboundary risk, the governance of biological control requires an approach that is risk-proportionate without stigmatizing legitimate science or constraining responsible innovation. The article develops an integrated One Health framework for governing biological control across classical, augmentative, conservation, microbial, and emerging genetic approaches. It argues that governance intensity should correspond to persistence, novelty, uncertainty, reversibility, operational integrity, and plausible consequences. Particular attention is given to ecological non-target effects, identity assurance, manufacturing quality, traceability and chain-of-custody, post-release monitoring, adaptive authorization, contingency pathways, and cross-border cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22119125
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological Control and Biological Security

Ikenna C. Okafor
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

Biological Control and Biological Security

Ikenna C. Okafor
article en

Abstract

This policy research article examines biological control as both a resilience instrument and a purposeful ecological intervention within contemporary biosecurity and health-security governance. As biological risks increasingly intersect with food-system stability, ecosystem integrity, biotechnology, supply-chain integrity, and transboundary risk, the governance of biological control requires an approach that is risk-proportionate without stigmatizing legitimate science or constraining responsible innovation. The article develops an integrated One Health framework for governing biological control across classical, augmentative, conservation, microbial, and emerging genetic approaches. It argues that governance intensity should correspond to persistence, novelty, uncertainty, reversibility, operational integrity, and plausible consequences. Particular attention is given to ecological non-target effects, identity assurance, manufacturing quality, traceability and chain-of-custody, post-release monitoring, adaptive authorization, contingency pathways, and cross-border cooperation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Kao Corporation (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biological Control and Biological Security — Ikenna C. Okafor · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS