SEVQuest - A subjective questionnaire on ecological validity for participant studies

Ecological validity has become an increasingly popular concept in hearing research. However, ecological validity is difficult to assess in practice. This study introduces a questionnaire-based approach to capture participants’ perception of ecological validity in laboratory experiments. The proposed instrument, the Subjective Ecological Validity Questionnaire (SEVQuest), was designed to assess how closely participants perceive an experimental situation and its outcomes to reflect real-life listening experiences. The questionnaire was applied in two virtual reality listening studies that investigated auditory perception in complex environments. Between the two studies, several modifications were implemented to improve the realism of the experimental setup. Results showed an overall increase in questionnaire ratings from the first to the second study, suggesting that these changes improved participants’ perception of the experimental environment. Overall, the results suggest that participant-based assessments can provide valuable insights into designing and evaluating experimental designs and may complement existing researcher-driven evaluation approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21062865
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SEVQuest - A subjective questionnaire on ecological validity for participant studies

Karolina Smeds, Janina Fels, Cosima A. Ermert, Herawati Kusuma Dewi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

SEVQuest - A subjective questionnaire on ecological validity for participant studies

Karolina Smeds, Janina Fels, Cosima A. Ermert, Herawati Kusuma Dewi
article en

Abstract

Ecological validity has become an increasingly popular concept in hearing research. However, ecological validity is difficult to assess in practice. This study introduces a questionnaire-based approach to capture participants’ perception of ecological validity in laboratory experiments. The proposed instrument, the Subjective Ecological Validity Questionnaire (SEVQuest), was designed to assess how closely participants perceive an experimental situation and its outcomes to reflect real-life listening experiences. The questionnaire was applied in two virtual reality listening studies that investigated auditory perception in complex environments. Between the two studies, several modifications were implemented to improve the realism of the experimental setup. Results showed an overall increase in questionnaire ratings from the first to the second study, suggesting that these changes improved participants’ perception of the experimental environment. Overall, the results suggest that participant-based assessments can provide valuable insights into designing and evaluating experimental designs and may complement existing researcher-driven evaluation approaches.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SEVQuest - A subjective questionnaire on ecological validity for participant studies — Karolina Smeds, Janina Fels, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS