Glucose Oxidoreductases for Glucose Monitoring: A Bird’s Eye View of Glucose-Sensing Enzymes II

Biosensors, utilizing glucose oxidoreductases as biological recognition elements (BREs), underpin current blood glucose monitoring (BGM) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technologies. Glucose oxidase remains the gold standard due to its high selectivity and stability, yet its oxygen dependency limits it to first- and second-generation sensing. Fungal flavin adenine dinucletotide (FAD)-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) has emerged as the standard for mediator-based second-generation sensors due to its oxygen insensitivity, though it requires further engineering to match the stability and selectivity for CGM applications. Recent research increasingly prioritizes third-generation sensors capable of direct electron transfer (DET). Bacterial FADGDHs are premier candidates, possessing intrinsic DET capabilities via dedicated covalently bound heme subunits, while cellobiose dehydrogenase represents a rising star utilizing non-covalently bound heme b as a built-in mediator. Both require extensive protein engineering to overcome inherent limitations in substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency toward glucose. This review introduces the protein and enzyme sciences of glucose oxidoreductases, which have been and expected to be applied to blood, interstitial fluid, and other biological fluids. It reviews their reported and expected sensing modalities and engineering strategies, including rational design and chimera construction, to enhance enzyme robustness, selectivity, and the availability of electron acceptors, including DET ability. It also introduces perspectives on future engineering approaches to create ideal glucose-sensing oxidoreductases. This review article is an updated version of “Review of Glucose Oxidases and Glucose Dehydrogenases: A Bird’s Eye View of Glucose Sensing Enzymes,” which was published in 2011 in the Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) ( https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681100500507 ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968261467418
Primary Topic
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glucose Oxidoreductases for Glucose Monitoring: A Bird’s Eye View of Glucose-Sensing Enzymes II

Junko Okuda‐Shimazaki, Mika Hatada, Koji Sode
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
article

Glucose Oxidoreductases for Glucose Monitoring: A Bird’s Eye View of Glucose-Sensing Enzymes II

Junko Okuda‐Shimazaki, Mika Hatada, Koji Sode
article en

Abstract

Biosensors, utilizing glucose oxidoreductases as biological recognition elements (BREs), underpin current blood glucose monitoring (BGM) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technologies. Glucose oxidase remains the gold standard due to its high selectivity and stability, yet its oxygen dependency limits it to first- and second-generation sensing. Fungal flavin adenine dinucletotide (FAD)-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) has emerged as the standard for mediator-based second-generation sensors due to its oxygen insensitivity, though it requires further engineering to match the stability and selectivity for CGM applications. Recent research increasingly prioritizes third-generation sensors capable of direct electron transfer (DET). Bacterial FADGDHs are premier candidates, possessing intrinsic DET capabilities via dedicated covalently bound heme subunits, while cellobiose dehydrogenase represents a rising star utilizing non-covalently bound heme b as a built-in mediator. Both require extensive protein engineering to overcome inherent limitations in substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency toward glucose. This review introduces the protein and enzyme sciences of glucose oxidoreductases, which have been and expected to be applied to blood, interstitial fluid, and other biological fluids. It reviews their reported and expected sensing modalities and engineering strategies, including rational design and chimera construction, to enhance enzyme robustness, selectivity, and the availability of electron acceptors, including DET ability. It also introduces perspectives on future engineering approaches to create ideal glucose-sensing oxidoreductases. This review article is an updated version of “Review of Glucose Oxidases and Glucose Dehydrogenases: A Bird’s Eye View of Glucose Sensing Enzymes,” which was published in 2011 in the Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) ( https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681100500507 ).

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (JP)
North Carolina State University, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.