Comparing the potential impacts of seasonal immunisation against year-round immunisation to prevent RSV infant hospitalisations in Japan: A modelling study

The seasonal circulation of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in countries such as Japan, together with the transient nature of passive immunity conferred to infants via maternal vaccination or monoclonal antibody administration, may warrant a differential strategy for those born between the RSV seasons. Maximal effectiveness may be achieved by deferring immunisation of this cohort from birth until entry into their first RSV season using catch-up administration of monoclonal antibody through a seasonal and catch-up programme, compared with year-round administration. To estimate the benefit of seasonal and catch-up programmes in reducing RSV infant hospitalisations in Japan, we developed a static cohort model following infants through their first year of life, parameterised by Japanese data on weekly and municipality-specific RSV incidence during 2018 to 2025 and on RSV case hospitalisation risk from a health claims database study. We used Bayesian inference to estimate the effectiveness and its waning for maternal vaccine (RSVpreF) and long-acting monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab) from trial data. We estimate that year-round programme of RSVpreF or nirsevimab could reduce RSV hospitalisations from the status quo, under which only high-risk infants are eligible for monoclonal antibodies, by 46% (95% uncertainty range (UR): 31%, 65%) or 58% (95% UR: 39%, 79%), respectively. In comparison, the seasonal and catch-up programme could reduce by 52% (95% UR: 37%, 65%) or 57% (95% UR: 38%, 75%), respectively. If seasonality matches the seasonal immunisation timing, using 2024 as an example, the reduction by the seasonal and catch-up programme would be 56% (95% UR: 46%, 67%) or 61% (95% UR: 44%, 77%), respectively. If protection from nirsevimab remained substantial after six months, the year-round programme would likely to be more effective. RSVpreF and nirsevimab may substantially reduce RSV infant hospitalisations in Japan. The benefit of the seasonal programmes depends on predictability of RSV seasonality and potential logistical challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129079
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparing the potential impacts of seasonal immunisation against year-round immunisation to prevent RSV infant hospitalisations in Japan: A modelling study

Stefan Flasche, Ayaka Monoi, Matej Kriznar, Akira Endo et al.
Vaccine
Respiratory viral infections research
article

Comparing the potential impacts of seasonal immunisation against year-round immunisation to prevent RSV infant hospitalisations in Japan: A modelling study

Stefan Flasche, Ayaka Monoi, Matej Kriznar, Akira Endo, Motoi Suzuki
article en

Abstract

The seasonal circulation of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in countries such as Japan, together with the transient nature of passive immunity conferred to infants via maternal vaccination or monoclonal antibody administration, may warrant a differential strategy for those born between the RSV seasons. Maximal effectiveness may be achieved by deferring immunisation of this cohort from birth until entry into their first RSV season using catch-up administration of monoclonal antibody through a seasonal and catch-up programme, compared with year-round administration. To estimate the benefit of seasonal and catch-up programmes in reducing RSV infant hospitalisations in Japan, we developed a static cohort model following infants through their first year of life, parameterised by Japanese data on weekly and municipality-specific RSV incidence during 2018 to 2025 and on RSV case hospitalisation risk from a health claims database study. We used Bayesian inference to estimate the effectiveness and its waning for maternal vaccine (RSVpreF) and long-acting monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab) from trial data. We estimate that year-round programme of RSVpreF or nirsevimab could reduce RSV hospitalisations from the status quo, under which only high-risk infants are eligible for monoclonal antibodies, by 46% (95% uncertainty range (UR): 31%, 65%) or 58% (95% UR: 39%, 79%), respectively. In comparison, the seasonal and catch-up programme could reduce by 52% (95% UR: 37%, 65%) or 57% (95% UR: 38%, 75%), respectively. If seasonality matches the seasonal immunisation timing, using 2024 as an example, the reduction by the seasonal and catch-up programme would be 56% (95% UR: 46%, 67%) or 61% (95% UR: 44%, 77%), respectively. If protection from nirsevimab remained substantial after six months, the year-round programme would likely to be more effective. RSVpreF and nirsevimab may substantially reduce RSV infant hospitalisations in Japan. The benefit of the seasonal programmes depends on predictability of RSV seasonality and potential logistical challenges.

VaccineVol. 91
University of Nagasaki (JP), Nagasaki University (JP), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Einstein Stiftung Berlin, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Respiratory viral infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.