Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilanthus and the Grammar of Possibility

A close look at some perplexing grammatical choices in Mary Wroth’s Sonnet 8 provides a route into the complex sentence architecture of Pamphilia to Amphilanthus. This essay models a close-reading practice attentive to Wroth’s grammatical experimentation, making use of functional grammar, historical linguistics, and classical rhetoric to help illuminate the multiple affordances of grammatical forms. It also situates its argument about Wroth’s grammatical craft in relation to the gendered cultural history of grammar pedagogy. Wroth’s intertextual poetic dialogue with other Sidney family poets brings this to light, featuring love poems foregrounding the potential mood or representing love in terms of grammar-school lessons. In Wroth’s sonnets of passionate mental deliberation, I examine the poetic work being done by grammatical modality, and especially auxiliary verbs like may, can, must, and shall that are undergoing semantic change in the early modern period. Considering how gendered politics and subjectivity are at work in sonnet syntax, the essay proposes a linguistically oriented approach to extend the developing resources of feminist formalism. [L.M.]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
English Literary Renaissance
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/742580
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilanthus and the Grammar of Possibility

Lynne Magnusson
English Literary Renaissance
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

Mary Wroth’s Pamphilia to Amphilanthus and the Grammar of Possibility

Lynne Magnusson
article en

Abstract

A close look at some perplexing grammatical choices in Mary Wroth’s Sonnet 8 provides a route into the complex sentence architecture of Pamphilia to Amphilanthus. This essay models a close-reading practice attentive to Wroth’s grammatical experimentation, making use of functional grammar, historical linguistics, and classical rhetoric to help illuminate the multiple affordances of grammatical forms. It also situates its argument about Wroth’s grammatical craft in relation to the gendered cultural history of grammar pedagogy. Wroth’s intertextual poetic dialogue with other Sidney family poets brings this to light, featuring love poems foregrounding the potential mood or representing love in terms of grammar-school lessons. In Wroth’s sonnets of passionate mental deliberation, I examine the poetic work being done by grammatical modality, and especially auxiliary verbs like may, can, must, and shall that are undergoing semantic change in the early modern period. Considering how gendered politics and subjectivity are at work in sonnet syntax, the essay proposes a linguistically oriented approach to extend the developing resources of feminist formalism. [L.M.]

English Literary RenaissanceVol. 56(3)
University of Toronto (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.