Vision‐Language‐Action Models for Embodied Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Survey

ABSTRACT Embodied artificial intelligence (Embodied AI) aims to develop agents that can perceive, reason, and act through continuous interaction with physical world. To achieve this goal, agents must not only understand visual scenes and language instructions, but also transform multimodal information into executable actions. This requirement calls for models that can integrate perception, semantic reasoning, and action generation within a unified decision‐making framework. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have provided important technical foundations for this integration, leading to emergence of vision‐language‐action (VLA) models as a central paradigm for embodied systems. Although existing surveys have reviewed Embodied AI from perspectives such as robotic systems, simulation environments and task settings, few have systematically analyzed action‐generation mechanisms of VLA models. This limitation makes it difficult to distinguish VLA architectures. To address this gap, we provide a comprehensive review of VLA models for Embodied AI from an action‐generation perspective. We first formulate VLA models as embodied decision‐making systems that map visual observations and language instructions to action sequences through interaction with dynamic environments. Building on this formulation, we review historical evolution of VLA models. Furthermore, we propose an action‐generation‐centered taxonomy that categorizes VLA models into three paradigms: direct policy learning, generative action modeling, and reasoning‐guided modeling. For each paradigm, we analyze representative methods, action‐generation mechanisms, advantages and limitations, thereby providing a coherent framework for comparing diverse VLA architectures. Beyond model architectures, we summarize key resources and benchmarking settings and discuss recent applications. Finally, we identify major challenges and future directions. By organizing VLA models around the central problem of action generation, we aim to provide a structured technical map for future research toward more general, reliable, and physically grounded Embodied AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Field Robotics
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.70340
Primary Topic
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vision‐Language‐Action Models for Embodied Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Survey

Jucheng Yang, Mingle Xu, Yuan Wang, Chuanlei Zhang et al.
Journal of Field Robotics
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
article

Vision‐Language‐Action Models for Embodied Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Survey

Jucheng Yang, Mingle Xu, Yuan Wang, Chuanlei Zhang, Ning Xiong, Jianming Liu, Wei Chen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Embodied artificial intelligence (Embodied AI) aims to develop agents that can perceive, reason, and act through continuous interaction with physical world. To achieve this goal, agents must not only understand visual scenes and language instructions, but also transform multimodal information into executable actions. This requirement calls for models that can integrate perception, semantic reasoning, and action generation within a unified decision‐making framework. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have provided important technical foundations for this integration, leading to emergence of vision‐language‐action (VLA) models as a central paradigm for embodied systems. Although existing surveys have reviewed Embodied AI from perspectives such as robotic systems, simulation environments and task settings, few have systematically analyzed action‐generation mechanisms of VLA models. This limitation makes it difficult to distinguish VLA architectures. To address this gap, we provide a comprehensive review of VLA models for Embodied AI from an action‐generation perspective. We first formulate VLA models as embodied decision‐making systems that map visual observations and language instructions to action sequences through interaction with dynamic environments. Building on this formulation, we review historical evolution of VLA models. Furthermore, we propose an action‐generation‐centered taxonomy that categorizes VLA models into three paradigms: direct policy learning, generative action modeling, and reasoning‐guided modeling. For each paradigm, we analyze representative methods, action‐generation mechanisms, advantages and limitations, thereby providing a coherent framework for comparing diverse VLA architectures. Beyond model architectures, we summarize key resources and benchmarking settings and discuss recent applications. Finally, we identify major challenges and future directions. By organizing VLA models around the central problem of action generation, we aim to provide a structured technical map for future research toward more general, reliable, and physically grounded Embodied AI.

Journal of Field Robotics
Tianjin University of Science and Technology (CN), Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN), Guangxi Academy of Sciences (CN), Guilin University of Electronic Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.