The subjective well-being penalty of same-sex couples relative to different-sex couples in Europe

Despite major advances in the legal recognition of same-sex couples across Europe, persistent social stigma and institutional inequalities may continue to shape their subjective well-being (SWB). This study examines whether individuals in same-sex couples report lower levels of SWB than those in different-sex couples and how two key dimensions of structural stigma—legal recognition of same-sex couples and societal acceptance of homosexuality—shape disparities in SWB. Using pooled data from ten rounds of the European Social Survey (2004–2023), covering 37 countries, we estimate regression models to assess the SWB penalty of individuals in same-sex relative to different-sex couples. We further test cross-level interactions between being in a same-sex (versus different-sex) couple and country-level indicators of structural stigma. Our results show that individuals in same-sex couples report significantly lower levels of SWB than those in different-sex couples, net of socio-demographic and economic controls. This penalty is strongly conditioned by context, however. In countries without legal recognition of same-sex couples, the well-being penalty is largest, whereas in countries recognizing civil unions or same-sex marriage, the penalty becomes statistically indistinguishable from zero. Higher levels of societal acceptance similarly attenuate the penalty in life satisfaction. These findings highlight the central role of legal and cultural environments in shaping well-being inequalities between individuals in same- and different-sex couples and emphasize the importance of structural inclusion for reducing minority stress in contemporary Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genus
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-026-00295-2
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The subjective well-being penalty of same-sex couples relative to different-sex couples in Europe

Manuela Stranges, Daniele Vignoli
Genus
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

The subjective well-being penalty of same-sex couples relative to different-sex couples in Europe

Manuela Stranges, Daniele Vignoli
article en

Abstract

Despite major advances in the legal recognition of same-sex couples across Europe, persistent social stigma and institutional inequalities may continue to shape their subjective well-being (SWB). This study examines whether individuals in same-sex couples report lower levels of SWB than those in different-sex couples and how two key dimensions of structural stigma—legal recognition of same-sex couples and societal acceptance of homosexuality—shape disparities in SWB. Using pooled data from ten rounds of the European Social Survey (2004–2023), covering 37 countries, we estimate regression models to assess the SWB penalty of individuals in same-sex relative to different-sex couples. We further test cross-level interactions between being in a same-sex (versus different-sex) couple and country-level indicators of structural stigma. Our results show that individuals in same-sex couples report significantly lower levels of SWB than those in different-sex couples, net of socio-demographic and economic controls. This penalty is strongly conditioned by context, however. In countries without legal recognition of same-sex couples, the well-being penalty is largest, whereas in countries recognizing civil unions or same-sex marriage, the penalty becomes statistically indistinguishable from zero. Higher levels of societal acceptance similarly attenuate the penalty in life satisfaction. These findings highlight the central role of legal and cultural environments in shaping well-being inequalities between individuals in same- and different-sex couples and emphasize the importance of structural inclusion for reducing minority stress in contemporary Europe.

Genus
University of Florence (IT), University of Calabria (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.