Perceptions of expertise and its development among critical care trainees and staff physicians: A qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND: In highly specialized fields such as critical care medicine (CCM), understanding how expertise is defined and developed is essential for both clinical practice and education. While expertise has been widely studied, its characteristics and developmental trajectory among critical care physicians remain incompletely understood. METHODS: The qualitative interview study involved purposively sampled CCM trainees and experienced staff physicians. Two systems-design researchers interviewed, recorded and transcribed the interviews verbatim. One researcher inductively coded all transcripts, while another researcher reviewed the codes and representative quotations. A CCM physician contributed to theme development, and interpretations were refined through team discussion. RESULTS: 36 participants were interviewed (18 trainees and 18 staff physicians). Expertise in CCM was described as multifaceted, encompassing knowledge, experience, technical and non-technical skills, communication, performance, and personal attributes. Mental model development emerged as a central indicator of progression toward expertise. Trainees and staff physicians largely shared similar views; however, trainees emphasized confidence in decision-making and the role of experts as mentors and leaders. DISCUSSION: Expertise in CCM extends beyond technical competence to include cognitive and interpersonal dimensions. The importance of mental models and decision-making under uncertainty highlights the role of experiential learning and reflective practice. Differences in perception between trainees and staff physicians suggest that confidence and teaching ability may serve as key markers of expertise from a learner perspective. CONCLUSION: Expertise in CCM is complex and evolving, shaped by experience, reflection, and cognitive development. These findings provide a foundation for optimizing ICU training strategies and supporting clinicians' progression toward expert performance in high-stakes environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Care
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2026.155715
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of expertise and its development among critical care trainees and staff physicians: A qualitative interview study

Ece Üreten, Victoria Mccredie, Catherine M. Burns
Journal of Critical Care
Nursing education and management
article

Perceptions of expertise and its development among critical care trainees and staff physicians: A qualitative interview study

Ece Üreten, Victoria Mccredie, Catherine M. Burns
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In highly specialized fields such as critical care medicine (CCM), understanding how expertise is defined and developed is essential for both clinical practice and education. While expertise has been widely studied, its characteristics and developmental trajectory among critical care physicians remain incompletely understood. METHODS: The qualitative interview study involved purposively sampled CCM trainees and experienced staff physicians. Two systems-design researchers interviewed, recorded and transcribed the interviews verbatim. One researcher inductively coded all transcripts, while another researcher reviewed the codes and representative quotations. A CCM physician contributed to theme development, and interpretations were refined through team discussion. RESULTS: 36 participants were interviewed (18 trainees and 18 staff physicians). Expertise in CCM was described as multifaceted, encompassing knowledge, experience, technical and non-technical skills, communication, performance, and personal attributes. Mental model development emerged as a central indicator of progression toward expertise. Trainees and staff physicians largely shared similar views; however, trainees emphasized confidence in decision-making and the role of experts as mentors and leaders. DISCUSSION: Expertise in CCM extends beyond technical competence to include cognitive and interpersonal dimensions. The importance of mental models and decision-making under uncertainty highlights the role of experiential learning and reflective practice. Differences in perception between trainees and staff physicians suggest that confidence and teaching ability may serve as key markers of expertise from a learner perspective. CONCLUSION: Expertise in CCM is complex and evolving, shaped by experience, reflection, and cognitive development. These findings provide a foundation for optimizing ICU training strategies and supporting clinicians' progression toward expert performance in high-stakes environments.

Journal of Critical CareVol. 97
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.