Regional powers and the Indo-Pacific: comparing India and Indonesia

Abstract The strategic approaches of regional powers to the Indo-Pacific remain under-researched. This article attempts to enhance our understanding by comparing India and Indonesia. At first glance, both countries share a number of similar general foreign policy traits (i.e. non-alignment), yet they approach the changing geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific rather differently. For example, while India has been a member of the Quad, Indonesia has remained fairly distant to U.S. led minilaterals in the Indo-Pacific, preferring ASEAN-centric multilateral cooperation instead. The article shows that these differences can be explained by taking into consideration two interrelated factors: The first factor pertains to how India and Indonesia perceive their own status in regional and international affairs, and how their status is perceived (and subsequently conferred or disavowed) by others. The second factor pertains to how India and Indonesia relate to their neighbors and their (sub)region, more specifically to their roles in regional integration processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Politics
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-026-00782-5
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional powers and the Indo-Pacific: comparing India and Indonesia

Felix Heiduk, Christian Wagner
International Politics
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Regional powers and the Indo-Pacific: comparing India and Indonesia

Felix Heiduk, Christian Wagner
article en

Abstract

Abstract The strategic approaches of regional powers to the Indo-Pacific remain under-researched. This article attempts to enhance our understanding by comparing India and Indonesia. At first glance, both countries share a number of similar general foreign policy traits (i.e. non-alignment), yet they approach the changing geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific rather differently. For example, while India has been a member of the Quad, Indonesia has remained fairly distant to U.S. led minilaterals in the Indo-Pacific, preferring ASEAN-centric multilateral cooperation instead. The article shows that these differences can be explained by taking into consideration two interrelated factors: The first factor pertains to how India and Indonesia perceive their own status in regional and international affairs, and how their status is perceived (and subsequently conferred or disavowed) by others. The second factor pertains to how India and Indonesia relate to their neighbors and their (sub)region, more specifically to their roles in regional integration processes.

International Politics
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regional powers and the Indo-Pacific: comparing India and Indonesia — Felix Heiduk, Christian Wagner · International Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS