System-level techno-economic analysis of hydrogen-fuelled genset internal combustion engines with exhaust-driven power recovery

Hydrogen-fuelled internal combustion engines (H 2 -ICEs) are increasingly considered as transitional low-carbon power technologies, yet their deployment is limited by reduced efficiency and high electricity costs under open-cycle operation. This study presents a unified thermodynamic and techno-economic comparison of gasoline, open-cycle hydrogen, and waste-heat-recovery-integrated H 2 -ICE generator systems using an ASPEN-based process simulation framework. At the highest stable equivalence ratios examined (φ = 1.045 for gasoline and φ = 0.857 for hydrogen), the open-cycle H 2 -ICE exhibits a 17.5 % lower brake thermal efficiency than gasoline, at 33.4 % versus 40.5 %. To mitigate this penalty, an exhaust-mounted electric turbogenerator (ETG) coupled with a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser is integrated to recover exhaust energy and enable in-situ hydrogen regeneration. When system performance is evaluated based on the combined engine brake and recovered electrical output, the integrated H 2 -ICE with waste heat recovery achieves apparent extended system-level energy utilisation factors of 54.4 % using ASPEN simulations and 52.3 % based on theoretical analysis. Techno-economic analysis under defined operating conditions of 5 h day −1 and 365 days year −1 shows that open-cycle hydrogen increases the levelised cost of electricity by approximately 34 % for grey hydrogen and more than 400 % for green hydrogen relative to gasoline, whereas waste heat recovery reduces the grey hydrogen LCOE to 0.727 MYR kWh −1 . This corresponds to reductions of 39.4 % relative to open-cycle hydrogen and 18.6 % relative to gasoline. Overall, the results demonstrate that the viability of hydrogen ICEs is governed by system-level energy recovery and integration rather than standalone engine efficiency, highlighting the thermodynamic potential of waste-heat-recovery-integrated H 2 -ICEs as a transitional low-carbon stationary power concept under favourable integration and component cost assumptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.122082
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

System-level techno-economic analysis of hydrogen-fuelled genset internal combustion engines with exhaust-driven power recovery

Chee Choy Chow, Jong Boon Ooi, Meng Choung Chiong, Agill Aynngran Raj Kumara Raj
Energy Conversion and Management
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
article

System-level techno-economic analysis of hydrogen-fuelled genset internal combustion engines with exhaust-driven power recovery

Chee Choy Chow, Jong Boon Ooi, Meng Choung Chiong, Agill Aynngran Raj Kumara Raj
article en

Abstract

Hydrogen-fuelled internal combustion engines (H 2 -ICEs) are increasingly considered as transitional low-carbon power technologies, yet their deployment is limited by reduced efficiency and high electricity costs under open-cycle operation. This study presents a unified thermodynamic and techno-economic comparison of gasoline, open-cycle hydrogen, and waste-heat-recovery-integrated H 2 -ICE generator systems using an ASPEN-based process simulation framework. At the highest stable equivalence ratios examined (φ = 1.045 for gasoline and φ = 0.857 for hydrogen), the open-cycle H 2 -ICE exhibits a 17.5 % lower brake thermal efficiency than gasoline, at 33.4 % versus 40.5 %. To mitigate this penalty, an exhaust-mounted electric turbogenerator (ETG) coupled with a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser is integrated to recover exhaust energy and enable in-situ hydrogen regeneration. When system performance is evaluated based on the combined engine brake and recovered electrical output, the integrated H 2 -ICE with waste heat recovery achieves apparent extended system-level energy utilisation factors of 54.4 % using ASPEN simulations and 52.3 % based on theoretical analysis. Techno-economic analysis under defined operating conditions of 5 h day −1 and 365 days year −1 shows that open-cycle hydrogen increases the levelised cost of electricity by approximately 34 % for grey hydrogen and more than 400 % for green hydrogen relative to gasoline, whereas waste heat recovery reduces the grey hydrogen LCOE to 0.727 MYR kWh −1 . This corresponds to reductions of 39.4 % relative to open-cycle hydrogen and 18.6 % relative to gasoline. Overall, the results demonstrate that the viability of hydrogen ICEs is governed by system-level energy recovery and integration rather than standalone engine efficiency, highlighting the thermodynamic potential of waste-heat-recovery-integrated H 2 -ICEs as a transitional low-carbon stationary power concept under favourable integration and component cost assumptions.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 369
Monash University Malaysia (MY), UCSI University (MY)
Monash University, Monash University Malaysia
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.