Changes in evidence used for FDA Novel Drug Approvals: 2016-2024

BACKGROUND: The 21st Century Cures Act (2017) was enacted during a period of evolving FDA flexibility in evidentiary standards for drug approval. To examine trends before and after implementation, we independently reviewed all novel drugs approved between 2016 and 2024. METHODS: We constructed a database of all novel FDA approvals from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2024. Each study linked to an approved drug (N = 6,763) was cataloged by study number, sponsorship, and timing of results reporting relative to completion. RESULTS: Since 2016, the number of studies supporting approval has steadily declined. Beginning in 2017, the modal number of studies per approval fell to one. Industry sponsorship increased while NIH-supported studies decreased. Average time to public posting of results exceeded the one-year statutory limit. CONCLUSIONS: In the post-2016 period, FDA approvals were supported by fewer studies and by a greater proportion of industry-sponsored studies. Although this may accelerate access to new therapies, it raises concerns about the strength of evidence for safety and effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342878
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in evidence used for FDA Novel Drug Approvals: 2016-2024

Aditya Narayan, Amanda Jeanette Koong, Veronica L. Irvin, S.M. Song et al.
PLoS ONE
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Changes in evidence used for FDA Novel Drug Approvals: 2016-2024

Aditya Narayan, Amanda Jeanette Koong, Veronica L. Irvin, S.M. Song, Robert M. Kaplan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 21st Century Cures Act (2017) was enacted during a period of evolving FDA flexibility in evidentiary standards for drug approval. To examine trends before and after implementation, we independently reviewed all novel drugs approved between 2016 and 2024. METHODS: We constructed a database of all novel FDA approvals from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2024. Each study linked to an approved drug (N = 6,763) was cataloged by study number, sponsorship, and timing of results reporting relative to completion. RESULTS: Since 2016, the number of studies supporting approval has steadily declined. Beginning in 2017, the modal number of studies per approval fell to one. Industry sponsorship increased while NIH-supported studies decreased. Average time to public posting of results exceeded the one-year statutory limit. CONCLUSIONS: In the post-2016 period, FDA approvals were supported by fewer studies and by a greater proportion of industry-sponsored studies. Although this may accelerate access to new therapies, it raises concerns about the strength of evidence for safety and effectiveness.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
Oregon State University (US), Palo Alto University (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Changes in evidence used for FDA Novel Drug Approvals: 2016-2024 — Aditya Narayan, Amanda Jeanette Koong, et al. · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS