Free Flap Reconstruction for Burn Injuries: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparison of Primary and Secondary Cases

Background: Most acute burn wounds are managed with skin grafting, yet many patients later develop contractures requiring secondary free flap reconstruction, which is widely believed to be more demanding than reconstruction in the acute setting. This clinical impression has rarely been quantified. This study compared the characteristics, operative parameters, and outcomes of primary and secondary free flap reconstruction for burn injuries. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 65 consecutive free flap reconstructions performed in 55 patients between 2012 and 2025 were categorized as primary (acute wound coverage during the initial burn admission, n = 35) or secondary (reconstruction of established scar contracture after discharge from acute care, n = 30). Demographics, burn extent, injury-to-reconstruction interval, prior operations, flap selection, operative time, secondary procedures, and complications were compared. Multivariable linear regression with sequential adjustment for age, sex, defect location, defect size, total body surface area (TBSA) burned, and flap complexity was used to estimate the adjusted difference in operative time. Results: Secondary patients were younger (40.8 vs. 55.1 years), more often female (70% vs. 29%), had larger burns (median TBSA 18% vs. 3%) and larger defects (348.5 vs. 203.3 cm2), and underwent reconstruction a median of 534 days after injury versus 30 days in the primary group. Operative time was longer in secondary cases (236.3 vs. 170.7 min; p < 0.001), and this association persisted after adjustment for age, sex, defect location, defect size, TBSA, and flap complexity (adjusted difference, 55.2 min; 95% CI, 20.4–90.1; p = 0.002) and in sensitivity analyses accounting for repeated procedures in the same patient. Flap complexity distribution and the frequency of secondary procedures did not differ between groups. Thoracodorsal vessel-based flaps were used in 90.8% of cases, and overall flap survival was 98.5%. Conclusions: Secondary free flap reconstruction for burn scar contracture required approximately 55 min longer than primary reconstruction of acute burn wounds, independently of defect size, burn extent, and flap complexity, whereas flap survival and the need for subsequent procedures were similar. Whether earlier free flap coverage of wounds at high risk of contracture could reduce this burden warrants prospective evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15176600
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Free Flap Reconstruction for Burn Injuries: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparison of Primary and Secondary Cases

Seung Eun Hong, Daihun Kang, Youn Hwan Kim, Hyungwoo Wang
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Free Flap Reconstruction for Burn Injuries: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparison of Primary and Secondary Cases

Seung Eun Hong, Daihun Kang, Youn Hwan Kim, Hyungwoo Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: Most acute burn wounds are managed with skin grafting, yet many patients later develop contractures requiring secondary free flap reconstruction, which is widely believed to be more demanding than reconstruction in the acute setting. This clinical impression has rarely been quantified. This study compared the characteristics, operative parameters, and outcomes of primary and secondary free flap reconstruction for burn injuries. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 65 consecutive free flap reconstructions performed in 55 patients between 2012 and 2025 were categorized as primary (acute wound coverage during the initial burn admission, n = 35) or secondary (reconstruction of established scar contracture after discharge from acute care, n = 30). Demographics, burn extent, injury-to-reconstruction interval, prior operations, flap selection, operative time, secondary procedures, and complications were compared. Multivariable linear regression with sequential adjustment for age, sex, defect location, defect size, total body surface area (TBSA) burned, and flap complexity was used to estimate the adjusted difference in operative time. Results: Secondary patients were younger (40.8 vs. 55.1 years), more often female (70% vs. 29%), had larger burns (median TBSA 18% vs. 3%) and larger defects (348.5 vs. 203.3 cm2), and underwent reconstruction a median of 534 days after injury versus 30 days in the primary group. Operative time was longer in secondary cases (236.3 vs. 170.7 min; p < 0.001), and this association persisted after adjustment for age, sex, defect location, defect size, TBSA, and flap complexity (adjusted difference, 55.2 min; 95% CI, 20.4–90.1; p = 0.002) and in sensitivity analyses accounting for repeated procedures in the same patient. Flap complexity distribution and the frequency of secondary procedures did not differ between groups. Thoracodorsal vessel-based flaps were used in 90.8% of cases, and overall flap survival was 98.5%. Conclusions: Secondary free flap reconstruction for burn scar contracture required approximately 55 min longer than primary reconstruction of acute burn wounds, independently of defect size, burn extent, and flap complexity, whereas flap survival and the need for subsequent procedures were similar. Whether earlier free flap coverage of wounds at high risk of contracture could reduce this burden warrants prospective evaluation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(17)
Ewha Womans University (KR), Hanyang University (KR), Anyang University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.