Procurement and Contract Management in Public Agencies: A Comparative Study of Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission and Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency

Abstract Public procurement and contract management are essential functions of public administration because they determine how governments use public funds to provide infrastructure, goods, and services that improve citizens' welfare. In developing countries, procurement represents a large share of government spending, making efficient and transparent procurement systems important for economic development, accountability, and public trust. In Nigeria, despite the Public Procurement Act 2007 and other procurement reforms, challenges such as procurement irregularities, abandoned projects, delayed contract execution, political interference, weak monitoring, and limited institutional capacity continue to affect service delivery across many Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs). This study examines procurement and contract management practices in the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) and the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency (NEMSA). Using a comparative case study based on documentary evidence and existing literature, it evaluates procurement planning, supplier selection, contract management, transparency, accountability, regulatory compliance, and risk management. The findings show that although both agencies operate under established legal and regulatory frameworks, procurement performance is still affected by bureaucratic delays, poor planning, limited professional capacity, weak monitoring, political influence, and inconsistent contract management. The study concludes that improving procurement requires more than legal compliance. It also depends on strong institutions, skilled professionals, digital procurement systems, effective audits, stakeholder oversight, and continuous accountability throughout the procurement process. Keywords: Public Procurement, Contract Management, Public Agencies, RSIEC, NEMSA, Governance, Accountability, Nigeria

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22110108
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procurement and Contract Management in Public Agencies: A Comparative Study of Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission and Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency

Lekue Jekey, OMUNAKWE AUSTIN ANACHOR
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Public Procurement and Policy
article

Procurement and Contract Management in Public Agencies: A Comparative Study of Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission and Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency

Lekue Jekey, OMUNAKWE AUSTIN ANACHOR
article en

Abstract

Abstract Public procurement and contract management are essential functions of public administration because they determine how governments use public funds to provide infrastructure, goods, and services that improve citizens' welfare. In developing countries, procurement represents a large share of government spending, making efficient and transparent procurement systems important for economic development, accountability, and public trust. In Nigeria, despite the Public Procurement Act 2007 and other procurement reforms, challenges such as procurement irregularities, abandoned projects, delayed contract execution, political interference, weak monitoring, and limited institutional capacity continue to affect service delivery across many Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs). This study examines procurement and contract management practices in the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) and the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency (NEMSA). Using a comparative case study based on documentary evidence and existing literature, it evaluates procurement planning, supplier selection, contract management, transparency, accountability, regulatory compliance, and risk management. The findings show that although both agencies operate under established legal and regulatory frameworks, procurement performance is still affected by bureaucratic delays, poor planning, limited professional capacity, weak monitoring, political influence, and inconsistent contract management. The study concludes that improving procurement requires more than legal compliance. It also depends on strong institutions, skilled professionals, digital procurement systems, effective audits, stakeholder oversight, and continuous accountability throughout the procurement process. Keywords: Public Procurement, Contract Management, Public Agencies, RSIEC, NEMSA, Governance, Accountability, Nigeria

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.