Utility of ABO genotyping for resolving serologic ambiguities in deceased organ donation

We evaluated blood group typing in a cohort of deceased organ donors comparing serological and genotyping methodologies. Our objectives were to determine the frequency and characteristics of serological discrepancies, assess concordance between phenotypic and genotypic results, and determine the utility of genotyping in resolving typing challenges in both the pre- and post-transfusion settings. Specimens from over forty-four thousand deceased donors were collected by Organ Procurement Organizations and submitted for STAT testing. Gel column agglutination or test tube method was performed for serological typing. Genotyping was performed on 471 donors using real-time PCR. Serologic ABO typing results were indeterminate in 4% of samples. ABO genotyping demonstrated high concordance with serologic typing in evaluable cases and successfully resolved many otherwise indeterminate donor evaluations. ABO genotyping is a reliable adjunct to serologic testing in deceased donor evaluation and provides value in transfused donors and cases with serologic ambiguity. Integration of genotyping methods into donor testing workflows may improve the safety, accuracy, and efficiency of organ allocation practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Immunology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2026.112060
Primary Topic
Blood groups and transfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of ABO genotyping for resolving serologic ambiguities in deceased organ donation

Jan J. Chew, Nathan A. Lemp, Richard Hasz, Brenden O'Neale et al.
Human Immunology
Blood groups and transfusion
article

Utility of ABO genotyping for resolving serologic ambiguities in deceased organ donation

Jan J. Chew, Nathan A. Lemp, Richard Hasz, Brenden O'Neale, Luis Santiago, Hillary Akana, Sara O. Dionne, Melissa Rafalko
article en

Abstract

We evaluated blood group typing in a cohort of deceased organ donors comparing serological and genotyping methodologies. Our objectives were to determine the frequency and characteristics of serological discrepancies, assess concordance between phenotypic and genotypic results, and determine the utility of genotyping in resolving typing challenges in both the pre- and post-transfusion settings. Specimens from over forty-four thousand deceased donors were collected by Organ Procurement Organizations and submitted for STAT testing. Gel column agglutination or test tube method was performed for serological typing. Genotyping was performed on 471 donors using real-time PCR. Serologic ABO typing results were indeterminate in 4% of samples. ABO genotyping demonstrated high concordance with serologic typing in evaluable cases and successfully resolved many otherwise indeterminate donor evaluations. ABO genotyping is a reliable adjunct to serologic testing in deceased donor evaluation and provides value in transfused donors and cases with serologic ambiguity. Integration of genotyping methods into donor testing workflows may improve the safety, accuracy, and efficiency of organ allocation practices.

Human ImmunologyVol. 87(10)
Mind and Life Institute (US), Eurofins (Netherlands) (NL), Eurofins (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Blood groups and transfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.