Inequalities in outcomes after kidney transplant failure in the UK

BACKGROUND: Failing transplant management is an international research priority. The Failing Kidney Transplant Outcomes Registry Analysis (FAKTOR) is investigating management and outcomes of kidney transplant failure in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis using UK Renal Registry data on adults (≥18 years) with kidney transplant failure (eGFR < 15ml/min/1.73m2) between 01/2012-12/2021. Treatment status was determined each year post-failure as the first status recorded of: i) re-transplantation, ii) haemodialysis (HD), iii) peritoneal dialysis (PD), iv) death; those alive without changing Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT) modality classed as v) alive without new KRT, subclassified as vi) managed conservatively if eGFR < 7.5ml/min/1.73 m2 with no future dialysis. Treatment status was determined by one-year post-failure and reported by: age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic group, primary renal disease (PRD) and centre type (transplanting/non-transplanting). When applicable, last eGFR pre-dialysis was recorded. Regression models investigated the relationship between patient characteristics and centre type with outcomes: i) treatment status by one-year and ii) pre-dialysis eGFR. RESULTS: We included 5447 patients. By one-year, 47.8% first received HD and 5.2% were pre-emptively re-transplanted. Black and Asian people were less likely to be re-transplanted than White people (Black Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.87. Asian RRR 0.57, 0.34-0.96). Males were more likely to be re-transplanted (RRR 1.39, 1.06-1.81) and to receive HD (RRR 1.68, 1.47-1.92). Each quintile increase in deprivation was associated with a 22% lower re-transplantation likelihood (RRR 0.78, 0.71-0.86). Diabetic PRD was associated with higher mortality (RRR 1.97, 1.34-2.88) relative to glomerulonephritis. Median pre-dialysis eGFR was 9.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 7.7-11.7) and 7.1% higher in non-transplanting compared with transplanting centres (+7.1%, + 2.6% to +11.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This first nationwide description of outcomes following kidney transplant failure in the UK highlights strong evidence of pre-emptive re-transplantation inequalities, favouring White people, those in less deprived areas and males.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356769
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequalities in outcomes after kidney transplant failure in the UK

George Greenhall, Shalini Santhakumaran, Matthew Beresford, Sherry Masoud et al.
PLoS ONE
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Inequalities in outcomes after kidney transplant failure in the UK

George Greenhall, Shalini Santhakumaran, Matthew Beresford, Sherry Masoud, Pippa Bailey, Barnaby Hole, Samuel Westaway, Maria Pippias, Siân Griffin, Rachel Hilton, Lucy Plumb, Dorothea Nitsch,  Matthew Robb
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failing transplant management is an international research priority. The Failing Kidney Transplant Outcomes Registry Analysis (FAKTOR) is investigating management and outcomes of kidney transplant failure in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis using UK Renal Registry data on adults (≥18 years) with kidney transplant failure (eGFR < 15ml/min/1.73m2) between 01/2012-12/2021. Treatment status was determined each year post-failure as the first status recorded of: i) re-transplantation, ii) haemodialysis (HD), iii) peritoneal dialysis (PD), iv) death; those alive without changing Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT) modality classed as v) alive without new KRT, subclassified as vi) managed conservatively if eGFR < 7.5ml/min/1.73 m2 with no future dialysis. Treatment status was determined by one-year post-failure and reported by: age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic group, primary renal disease (PRD) and centre type (transplanting/non-transplanting). When applicable, last eGFR pre-dialysis was recorded. Regression models investigated the relationship between patient characteristics and centre type with outcomes: i) treatment status by one-year and ii) pre-dialysis eGFR. RESULTS: We included 5447 patients. By one-year, 47.8% first received HD and 5.2% were pre-emptively re-transplanted. Black and Asian people were less likely to be re-transplanted than White people (Black Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.87. Asian RRR 0.57, 0.34-0.96). Males were more likely to be re-transplanted (RRR 1.39, 1.06-1.81) and to receive HD (RRR 1.68, 1.47-1.92). Each quintile increase in deprivation was associated with a 22% lower re-transplantation likelihood (RRR 0.78, 0.71-0.86). Diabetic PRD was associated with higher mortality (RRR 1.97, 1.34-2.88) relative to glomerulonephritis. Median pre-dialysis eGFR was 9.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 7.7-11.7) and 7.1% higher in non-transplanting compared with transplanting centres (+7.1%, + 2.6% to +11.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This first nationwide description of outcomes following kidney transplant failure in the UK highlights strong evidence of pre-emptive re-transplantation inequalities, favouring White people, those in less deprived areas and males.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), NHS Blood and Transplant (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), University Hospital of Wales (GB), Kidney Research UK (GB), Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (GB), Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), University College London (GB)
Kidney Research UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.