Improved Deep Learning Segmentation of Pediatric Diffuse Midline Gliomas After Treatment

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a pediatric diffuse midline glioma (DMG) auto-segmentation tool optimized for longitudinal treatment response assessment across the disease course. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, we included patients aged 1-30 years with DMG from an institutional pediatric cancer center, BraTS-PEDs 2024, and PNOC007, a prospective trial of radiation followed by peptide vaccine plus poly-ICLC, and we trained nnU-Net-based DMGtracker using expert segmentations from 140 institutional pre- and post-treatment studies and all 261 BraTS-PEDs 2024 pre-treatment studies, using four-sequence multiparametric MRI (T1, T1 post-contrast, T2, and FLAIR). We externally validated the model on 88 annotated PNOC007 studies (n = 49 patients) and compared it with the BraTS-PEDs 2024 winning model using median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and relative volumetric difference (RVD) for whole-tumor and contrast-enhancing tumor segmentation using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Training and internal testing used 153 scans (59 post-treatment) from 74 patients. Incorporating post-treatment data improved internal whole-tumor DSC for our trained model (0.94 [IQR 0.82-0.96] vs 0.93 [0.81-0.96]; p<0.001). On external validation, DMGtracker outperformed the BraTS-PEDs 2024 winning model for whole-tumor segmentation, with higher DSC (0.90 [0.72-0.95] vs 0.81 [0.66-0.90]) and lower RVD (9.6% [3.7%-31.6%] vs 16.8% [7.3%-39.2%]). This advantage was greatest in post-treatment scans (n = 50 scans, DSC 0.90 [0.73-0.94] vs 0.80 [0.58-0.88]; RVD 9.7% [3.8%-26.2%] vs 19.8% [12.6%-39.8%]; p<0.001 for both). In post-treatment scans, DMGtracker achieved clinically acceptable whole-tumor segmentation (DSC > 0.80) in 64.0% of cases, compared with 52.0% for the BraTS-PEDs winner. CONCLUSION: Training DMG segmentation models with post-treatment scans substantially improves performance in longitudinal clinical trial imaging, enabling more accurate volumetric tracking and response assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9609
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Deep Learning Segmentation of Pediatric Diffuse Midline Gliomas After Treatment

Hugo J.W.L. Aerts, Rajath Ramegowda, Atlas Haddadi Avval, Sridhar Vajapeyam et al.
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Improved Deep Learning Segmentation of Pediatric Diffuse Midline Gliomas After Treatment

Hugo J.W.L. Aerts, Rajath Ramegowda, Atlas Haddadi Avval, Sridhar Vajapeyam, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Anna Zapaishchykova, Vanessa Rameh, John Zielke, Marius George Linguraru, Zezhong Ye, Cesar Alves, Omar Arnaout, Reza Mojahed-Yazdi, Francesca Romana Mussa, Andrew G. Schneider, Tina Y. Poussaint, Daphne A. Haas-Kogan, Divyanshu Tak, Abdelrahman Hanafy, Benjamin H. Kann, Sabine Mueller
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a pediatric diffuse midline glioma (DMG) auto-segmentation tool optimized for longitudinal treatment response assessment across the disease course. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, we included patients aged 1-30 years with DMG from an institutional pediatric cancer center, BraTS-PEDs 2024, and PNOC007, a prospective trial of radiation followed by peptide vaccine plus poly-ICLC, and we trained nnU-Net-based DMGtracker using expert segmentations from 140 institutional pre- and post-treatment studies and all 261 BraTS-PEDs 2024 pre-treatment studies, using four-sequence multiparametric MRI (T1, T1 post-contrast, T2, and FLAIR). We externally validated the model on 88 annotated PNOC007 studies (n = 49 patients) and compared it with the BraTS-PEDs 2024 winning model using median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and relative volumetric difference (RVD) for whole-tumor and contrast-enhancing tumor segmentation using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Training and internal testing used 153 scans (59 post-treatment) from 74 patients. Incorporating post-treatment data improved internal whole-tumor DSC for our trained model (0.94 [IQR 0.82-0.96] vs 0.93 [0.81-0.96]; p<0.001). On external validation, DMGtracker outperformed the BraTS-PEDs 2024 winning model for whole-tumor segmentation, with higher DSC (0.90 [0.72-0.95] vs 0.81 [0.66-0.90]) and lower RVD (9.6% [3.7%-31.6%] vs 16.8% [7.3%-39.2%]). This advantage was greatest in post-treatment scans (n = 50 scans, DSC 0.90 [0.73-0.94] vs 0.80 [0.58-0.88]; RVD 9.7% [3.8%-26.2%] vs 19.8% [12.6%-39.8%]; p<0.001 for both). In post-treatment scans, DMGtracker achieved clinically acceptable whole-tumor segmentation (DSC > 0.80) in 64.0% of cases, compared with 52.0% for the BraTS-PEDs winner. CONCLUSION: Training DMG segmentation models with post-treatment scans substantially improves performance in longitudinal clinical trial imaging, enabling more accurate volumetric tracking and response assessment.

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.