Nationalization, network structure and partisan polarization

Existing research has explored the link between nationalization of politics in the US and increasing partisan polarization. However, no study heretofore has systematically examined how different social network structures interact with increasingly nationalized partisan interactions to result in sustained partisan polarization. Results from analyses of a number of different network specifications, different network sizes, different average degrees and different nationalization levels show that the level and speed of polarization are governed by two interchangeable channels of partisan exposure — the volume of local connectivity (average degree) and the strength of the national signal (nationalization), while a comparison between a Facebook network and four theoretical networks reveal that mixing speed (algebraic connectivity) and community structure (modularity) shape the durability of polarization. Therefore, polarization is best understood as the emergent product of nationalization and connectivity, with network structure a genuine but second-order contributor whose influence is greatest when nationalization is low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS complex systems.
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000121
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nationalization, network structure and partisan polarization

Jing Li
PLOS complex systems.
Social Media and Politics
article

Nationalization, network structure and partisan polarization

Jing Li
article en

Abstract

Existing research has explored the link between nationalization of politics in the US and increasing partisan polarization. However, no study heretofore has systematically examined how different social network structures interact with increasingly nationalized partisan interactions to result in sustained partisan polarization. Results from analyses of a number of different network specifications, different network sizes, different average degrees and different nationalization levels show that the level and speed of polarization are governed by two interchangeable channels of partisan exposure — the volume of local connectivity (average degree) and the strength of the national signal (nationalization), while a comparison between a Facebook network and four theoretical networks reveal that mixing speed (algebraic connectivity) and community structure (modularity) shape the durability of polarization. Therefore, polarization is best understood as the emergent product of nationalization and connectivity, with network structure a genuine but second-order contributor whose influence is greatest when nationalization is low.

PLOS complex systems.Vol. 3(8)
University of Calgary (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.