Immediate Microbiological Efficacy of Electrolytic Cleaning Compared to Chlorhexidine in Peri-Implantitis: A Randomized Pilot Study

Background: Implant-surface decontamination is required before reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis, but no protocol has demonstrated consistent clinical superiority. Objective: To compare the immediate reduction in recoverable bacterial target DNA after electrolytic cleaning and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX). Materials and Methods: Forty nonsmoking patients with peri-implantitis (one implant per patient) were randomized to GalvoSurge (n = 20) or CHX (n = 20). Microbiological samples were collected from the exposed implant surface before and immediately after the assigned decontamination protocol and standardized terminal sterile-saline irrigation. Five periodontal pathogens were assessed using semiquantitative DNA-based real-time PCR (qPCR). Laboratory categories were converted to an exploratory summed ordinal score (range 0–15). A post hoc cumulative logit model compared post-treatment scores between groups while adjusting for the pretreatment score. Results: Pretreatment scores were higher in the GalvoSurge group (median 4.5, IQR 3.0–6.0) than in the CHX group (median 3.0, IQR 2.75–4.0; p = 0.043). After baseline adjustment, GalvoSurge was associated with lower post-treatment scores (adjusted common odds ratio for a higher score, 0.047; 95% profile-likelihood CI, 0.009–0.202; p < 0.001). Unadjusted analyses also favored GalvoSurge for absolute reduction (median 4.0 vs. 1.0), relative reduction (83.3% vs. 26.7%), and post-treatment score (median 1.0 vs. 2.0; all p < 0.001). Complete target non-detection occurred in 7/20 (35.0%) and 2/20 (10.0%) patients, respectively (Fisher’s exact p = 0.127). Conclusions: In this exploratory randomized pilot sample, GalvoSurge was associated with a greater immediate reduction in recoverable bacterial target DNA than CHX after adjustment for pretreatment score. DNA-based qPCR does not distinguish viable from non-viable bacteria; therefore, the findings do not establish bacterial killing, sterility, or long-term clinical superiority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178485
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Immediate Microbiological Efficacy of Electrolytic Cleaning Compared to Chlorhexidine in Peri-Implantitis: A Randomized Pilot Study

Roko Bjelica, Dragana Gabrić, Dražena Gerbl, Igor Smojver et al.
Applied Sciences
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Immediate Microbiological Efficacy of Electrolytic Cleaning Compared to Chlorhexidine in Peri-Implantitis: A Randomized Pilot Study

Roko Bjelica, Dragana Gabrić, Dražena Gerbl, Igor Smojver, Yuval Reiser, Ana Budimir
article en

Abstract

Background: Implant-surface decontamination is required before reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis, but no protocol has demonstrated consistent clinical superiority. Objective: To compare the immediate reduction in recoverable bacterial target DNA after electrolytic cleaning and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX). Materials and Methods: Forty nonsmoking patients with peri-implantitis (one implant per patient) were randomized to GalvoSurge (n = 20) or CHX (n = 20). Microbiological samples were collected from the exposed implant surface before and immediately after the assigned decontamination protocol and standardized terminal sterile-saline irrigation. Five periodontal pathogens were assessed using semiquantitative DNA-based real-time PCR (qPCR). Laboratory categories were converted to an exploratory summed ordinal score (range 0–15). A post hoc cumulative logit model compared post-treatment scores between groups while adjusting for the pretreatment score. Results: Pretreatment scores were higher in the GalvoSurge group (median 4.5, IQR 3.0–6.0) than in the CHX group (median 3.0, IQR 2.75–4.0; p = 0.043). After baseline adjustment, GalvoSurge was associated with lower post-treatment scores (adjusted common odds ratio for a higher score, 0.047; 95% profile-likelihood CI, 0.009–0.202; p < 0.001). Unadjusted analyses also favored GalvoSurge for absolute reduction (median 4.0 vs. 1.0), relative reduction (83.3% vs. 26.7%), and post-treatment score (median 1.0 vs. 2.0; all p < 0.001). Complete target non-detection occurred in 7/20 (35.0%) and 2/20 (10.0%) patients, respectively (Fisher’s exact p = 0.127). Conclusions: In this exploratory randomized pilot sample, GalvoSurge was associated with a greater immediate reduction in recoverable bacterial target DNA than CHX after adjustment for pretreatment score. DNA-based qPCR does not distinguish viable from non-viable bacteria; therefore, the findings do not establish bacterial killing, sterility, or long-term clinical superiority.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(17)
University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR), University of Zagreb (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.