Complexity and Construction Management: An Integrated Analysis of Logistics, Organizational Processes, and Productivity

Prior studies have commonly examined organizational structure, managerial processes, construction logistics, productivity, and project complexity through separate research streams, leaving limited empirical evidence on how these domains are positioned within a single multilevel construction management framework. This study develops an integrated analysis of their relationships using data from construction firms operating in Cochabamba, Bolivia, and the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba, Brazil. A quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional design was adopted, and 108 valid survey responses were analyzed through descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, reliability assessment, regional comparison, and Relative Importance Index ranking. The results showed that formal organizational characteristics displayed comparatively limited direct associations with performance-related variables, whereas stronger relationships were concentrated among managerial, strategic–logistical, and operational processes. The project complexity analysis retained three dimensions—technical, process-stage, and planning-related complexity—which jointly explained 61.271% of the rotated variance. At the operational level, equipment and tool maintenance, schedule adherence, and material storage received the highest Relative Importance Index values, with RII = 0.776 for each item. The findings indicate that construction performance is more closely associated with the dynamic processes through which information, decisions, responsibilities, and resources are coordinated than with formal structure considered independently. The study contributes a multilevel conceptual framework in which project complexity is interpreted as increasing the coordination requirements linking organizational arrangements, managerial processes, logistics, and operational reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16173406
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complexity and Construction Management: An Integrated Analysis of Logistics, Organizational Processes, and Productivity

Oriana Palma Calabokis, Walter Antonio Abujder Ochoa, Alfredo Iarozinski Neto, Diego Andrés Chacón Quiroga et al.
Buildings
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Complexity and Construction Management: An Integrated Analysis of Logistics, Organizational Processes, and Productivity

Oriana Palma Calabokis, Walter Antonio Abujder Ochoa, Alfredo Iarozinski Neto, Diego Andrés Chacón Quiroga, Dayler Taborga Guzmán, Miguel Rivero Chavez, Sebastián Javier García Mendivil
article en

Abstract

Prior studies have commonly examined organizational structure, managerial processes, construction logistics, productivity, and project complexity through separate research streams, leaving limited empirical evidence on how these domains are positioned within a single multilevel construction management framework. This study develops an integrated analysis of their relationships using data from construction firms operating in Cochabamba, Bolivia, and the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba, Brazil. A quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional design was adopted, and 108 valid survey responses were analyzed through descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, reliability assessment, regional comparison, and Relative Importance Index ranking. The results showed that formal organizational characteristics displayed comparatively limited direct associations with performance-related variables, whereas stronger relationships were concentrated among managerial, strategic–logistical, and operational processes. The project complexity analysis retained three dimensions—technical, process-stage, and planning-related complexity—which jointly explained 61.271% of the rotated variance. At the operational level, equipment and tool maintenance, schedule adherence, and material storage received the highest Relative Importance Index values, with RII = 0.776 for each item. The findings indicate that construction performance is more closely associated with the dynamic processes through which information, decisions, responsibilities, and resources are coordinated than with formal structure considered independently. The study contributes a multilevel conceptual framework in which project complexity is interpreted as increasing the coordination requirements linking organizational arrangements, managerial processes, logistics, and operational reliability.

BuildingsVol. 16(17)
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidad Central (BO), Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores (CO), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.