Stop paying predatory publishers of academic journals—A policy proposal to restore scientific integrity and transparency

Scientific publishing is undergoing a systemic breakdown. Thousands of journals now collect article processing charges (APCs)-increasingly paid from public research funds-while providing minimal editorial oversight. This erodes standards, distorts incentives and threatens public trust in science. APC payments to six major publishers exceeded 8 billion dollars between 2019 and 2023, with almost no transparency over how these fees are set or spent. This cannot continue. We propose that public and institutional funds support journals-whether through APCs, subscriptions or bundled agreements-only where they are accredited against a transparent, enforceable quality standard. Implemented in stages and led by funding bodies and learned societies, such accreditation would narrow the space in which predatory journals operate without resorting to blacklists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FEBS Letters
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.70451
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stop paying predatory publishers of academic journals—A policy proposal to restore scientific integrity and transparency

Michael Hochberg, António Ventosa, W. Verstraete, Purificación López‐García et al.
FEBS Letters
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Stop paying predatory publishers of academic journals—A policy proposal to restore scientific integrity and transparency

Michael Hochberg, António Ventosa, W. Verstraete, Purificación López‐García, Max Chavarría, Stipan Jonjić, Chris Greening, Zeynep Ceren Karahan, Juan Luis Ramos, Angela Sessitsch, Paul B. Rainey, Cristina Silva Pereira, Olga Nunes (7006082), Rafael Giraldo, Paul A. Williams, Bruce R. Levin, Rachel Armstrong, Kenneth N. Timmis, Eliora Ron, Brandon Berryhill, Karen Steward, Hui Wang
article en

Abstract

Scientific publishing is undergoing a systemic breakdown. Thousands of journals now collect article processing charges (APCs)-increasingly paid from public research funds-while providing minimal editorial oversight. This erodes standards, distorts incentives and threatens public trust in science. APC payments to six major publishers exceeded 8 billion dollars between 2019 and 2023, with almost no transparency over how these fees are set or spent. This cannot continue. We propose that public and institutional funds support journals-whether through APCs, subscriptions or bundled agreements-only where they are accredited against a transparent, enforceable quality standard. Implemented in stages and led by funding bodies and learned societies, such accreditation would narrow the space in which predatory journals operate without resorting to blacklists.

FEBS Letters
Uppsala University (SE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Emory University (US), University of Rijeka (HR), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Tel Aviv University (IL), Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidad Nacional (CR), Université de Montpellier (FR), AgroParisTech (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Discovery Institute (US), Universidad de Costa Rica (CR), Ghent University (BE), Ecologie, Société, Evolution (FR), Estación Experimental del Zaidín (ES), Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (ES), Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (FR), Sina Hospital (IR), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology (DE), Sunny BioDiscovery (United States) (US), Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica (PT), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Universidad de Sevilla (ES), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE), Tsinghua University (CN), KU Leuven (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.