Metabolism in Tumor: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives

ABSTRACT Tumor metabolic reprogramming now extends far beyond the Warburg effect, spanning glycolysis, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), de novo lipogenesis, cholesterol biosynthesis, and fatty acid oxidation. This network is shaped by cell‐intrinsic regulatory layers—transcriptional programs, histone lactylation and other posttranslational modifications, and m 6 A RNA modification—and by metabolic crosstalk with tumor‐associated macrophages (TAMs) and cancer‐associated fibroblasts (CAFs) that drives immune evasion and drug resistance. How these diverse inputs converge remains undefined: no integrated framework connects regulatory layers to signaling networks such as PI3K–AKT–mTOR, HIF‐1α, and cGAS–STING, or explains how their convergence generates metabolic plasticity. This review organizes tumor metabolic reprogramming into functional modules centered on three convergence hubs: the SREBP1/2–FASN–SCD1 lipogenic axis, the HIF‐1α–GLUT1–LDHA glycolytic axis, and the LDLR–SCARB1–LXR cholesterol homeostasis system. The discussion traces how multilayered regulation sustains each hub, how metabolic competition between tumor cells and immune effectors creates immunometabolic checkpoints, and how compensatory rewiring undermines single‐agent inhibitors. Therapeutic strategies span rational combination regimens that preempt compensatory rewiring to nanomedicine platforms enabling spatially controlled metabolism–immunity reprogramming. By identifying the hubs upon which diverse oncogenic signals converge, this framework reveals context‐specific metabolic vulnerabilities and outlines priorities for biomarker‐driven patient stratification and hub‐targeted combination therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MedComm
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.70928
Primary Topic
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Metabolism in Tumor: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives

Yang Zhao, Jie‐Lin Wang, Shuo Chen, Shan Jiang et al.
MedComm
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
article

Metabolism in Tumor: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives

Yang Zhao, Jie‐Lin Wang, Shuo Chen, Shan Jiang, Xiang-Chun Huang, Jia-Chen Cheng, Yi‐Xuan Hu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tumor metabolic reprogramming now extends far beyond the Warburg effect, spanning glycolysis, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), de novo lipogenesis, cholesterol biosynthesis, and fatty acid oxidation. This network is shaped by cell‐intrinsic regulatory layers—transcriptional programs, histone lactylation and other posttranslational modifications, and m 6 A RNA modification—and by metabolic crosstalk with tumor‐associated macrophages (TAMs) and cancer‐associated fibroblasts (CAFs) that drives immune evasion and drug resistance. How these diverse inputs converge remains undefined: no integrated framework connects regulatory layers to signaling networks such as PI3K–AKT–mTOR, HIF‐1α, and cGAS–STING, or explains how their convergence generates metabolic plasticity. This review organizes tumor metabolic reprogramming into functional modules centered on three convergence hubs: the SREBP1/2–FASN–SCD1 lipogenic axis, the HIF‐1α–GLUT1–LDHA glycolytic axis, and the LDLR–SCARB1–LXR cholesterol homeostasis system. The discussion traces how multilayered regulation sustains each hub, how metabolic competition between tumor cells and immune effectors creates immunometabolic checkpoints, and how compensatory rewiring undermines single‐agent inhibitors. Therapeutic strategies span rational combination regimens that preempt compensatory rewiring to nanomedicine platforms enabling spatially controlled metabolism–immunity reprogramming. By identifying the hubs upon which diverse oncogenic signals converge, this framework reveals context‐specific metabolic vulnerabilities and outlines priorities for biomarker‐driven patient stratification and hub‐targeted combination therapy.

MedCommVol. 7(9)
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute (CN), China Medical University (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.