Coherence Integrity for AI Systems II: Dynamic Alignment Through Four-Delusion Avoidance and Affective Engrams

This paper presents a conceptual framework for the safety of artificial general intelligence operating across extended periods of time. It argues that conventional safeguards based primarily on fixed rules, immutable model parameters, and output filtering cannot by themselves address the gradual displacement of a system’s interpretive and behavioral orientation as it encounters new contexts. The paper names this phenomenon Shifting Consistency and treats it as a central challenge for reliable machine agency. The framework reinterprets the four fundamental afflictions of Yogācāra thought—gachi, gaken, gaman, and ga’ai—as structural patterns of failure in advanced computational agents. These patterns correspond, respectively, to ignorance of epistemic limits, the reification of a single perspective, resistance to corrective evidence, and attachment to particular internal states or continued operation. The paper explicitly presents this mapping as an analogy at the level of failure structure, rather than as a claim that artificial systems possess human consciousness or Buddhist afflictions. Building on the Affective Engram Architecture, the paper proposes a three-layer design that combines local adaptation, a non-parametric substrate for preserving relational orientation, and an engine for endogenous goal generation. It further examines plural objective design, precision attenuation, differentiated safety pathways, peer-based oversight, and an external execution boundary with fail-closed properties. The central thesis is that reliable agency requires controlled deviation: the capacity to explore and change while retaining restorative mechanisms that support transparency, correctability, pluralistic judgment, and continued human oversight. The proposal is offered as a research program for future experimental validation, not as a claim that the safety problem has been solved. (This work was created based on the author's concept, with AI Gemini conducting Deep Research and AI Manus handling text generation, and completed under the author's supervision.)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22115733
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Coherence Integrity for AI Systems II: Dynamic Alignment Through Four-Delusion Avoidance and Affective Engrams

Hiroyoshi Takaki
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Coherence Integrity for AI Systems II: Dynamic Alignment Through Four-Delusion Avoidance and Affective Engrams

Hiroyoshi Takaki
preprint en

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework for the safety of artificial general intelligence operating across extended periods of time. It argues that conventional safeguards based primarily on fixed rules, immutable model parameters, and output filtering cannot by themselves address the gradual displacement of a system’s interpretive and behavioral orientation as it encounters new contexts. The paper names this phenomenon Shifting Consistency and treats it as a central challenge for reliable machine agency. The framework reinterprets the four fundamental afflictions of Yogācāra thought—gachi, gaken, gaman, and ga’ai—as structural patterns of failure in advanced computational agents. These patterns correspond, respectively, to ignorance of epistemic limits, the reification of a single perspective, resistance to corrective evidence, and attachment to particular internal states or continued operation. The paper explicitly presents this mapping as an analogy at the level of failure structure, rather than as a claim that artificial systems possess human consciousness or Buddhist afflictions. Building on the Affective Engram Architecture, the paper proposes a three-layer design that combines local adaptation, a non-parametric substrate for preserving relational orientation, and an engine for endogenous goal generation. It further examines plural objective design, precision attenuation, differentiated safety pathways, peer-based oversight, and an external execution boundary with fail-closed properties. The central thesis is that reliable agency requires controlled deviation: the capacity to explore and change while retaining restorative mechanisms that support transparency, correctability, pluralistic judgment, and continued human oversight. The proposal is offered as a research program for future experimental validation, not as a claim that the safety problem has been solved. (This work was created based on the author's concept, with AI Gemini conducting Deep Research and AI Manus handling text generation, and completed under the author's supervision.)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Coherence Integrity for AI Systems II: Dynamic Alignment Through Four-Delusion Avoidance and Affective Engrams — Hiroyoshi Takaki · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS