Development and validation of a conflict management competencies assessment questionnaire for surgical residents in the operating room

Conflict is an unavoidable aspect of clinical practice, especially within demanding settings such as surgical departments. This study aimed to develop and validate a specialized tool for assessing surgical residents’ conflict management skills in the Operating Room (OR). A sequential exploratory mixed-method design was conducted in four phases. First, a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR guideline identified essential concepts of conflict management in clinical practice. Second, qualitative interviews with 20 surgical education experts were analyzed using Graneheim and Lundman’s conventional content analysis to uncover underlying dimensions. Third, the Questionnaire for Surgical Residents was developed based on the model proposed by Jenn (2006), resulting in a 42-item instrument—the Interprofessional Conflict Management Questionnaire for Surgical Residents. Fourth, a cross-sectional survey was conducted with 400 surgical residents from multiple teaching hospitals across different surgical specialties. Content validity was evaluated using Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) with input from 10 experts. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with Varimax rotation was performed to determine the latent structure. After validation, two items with CVR values below 0.62 were removed, resulting in a 40-item final questionnaire. The EFA revealed a seven-factor structure encompassing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and intergroup competencies, explaining 59.55% of the total variance. All factor loadings exceeded 0.40, confirming acceptable construct representation. Cronbach’s alpha values for the subscales ranged from 0.76 to 0.94, with overall reliability at 0.83. The developed instrument demonstrated acceptable and promising psychometric properties and cultural relevance for evaluating conflict management competencies among surgical residents in Iran. It offers a valid and preliminary framework for assessing residents’ ability to manage interpersonal and organizational conflicts in clinical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10255-1
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a conflict management competencies assessment questionnaire for surgical residents in the operating room

Sohrab Nosrati, Zohreh Sohrabi, Shoaleh Bigdeli
BMC Medical Education
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Development and validation of a conflict management competencies assessment questionnaire for surgical residents in the operating room

Sohrab Nosrati, Zohreh Sohrabi, Shoaleh Bigdeli
article en

Abstract

Conflict is an unavoidable aspect of clinical practice, especially within demanding settings such as surgical departments. This study aimed to develop and validate a specialized tool for assessing surgical residents’ conflict management skills in the Operating Room (OR). A sequential exploratory mixed-method design was conducted in four phases. First, a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR guideline identified essential concepts of conflict management in clinical practice. Second, qualitative interviews with 20 surgical education experts were analyzed using Graneheim and Lundman’s conventional content analysis to uncover underlying dimensions. Third, the Questionnaire for Surgical Residents was developed based on the model proposed by Jenn (2006), resulting in a 42-item instrument—the Interprofessional Conflict Management Questionnaire for Surgical Residents. Fourth, a cross-sectional survey was conducted with 400 surgical residents from multiple teaching hospitals across different surgical specialties. Content validity was evaluated using Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) with input from 10 experts. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with Varimax rotation was performed to determine the latent structure. After validation, two items with CVR values below 0.62 were removed, resulting in a 40-item final questionnaire. The EFA revealed a seven-factor structure encompassing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and intergroup competencies, explaining 59.55% of the total variance. All factor loadings exceeded 0.40, confirming acceptable construct representation. Cronbach’s alpha values for the subscales ranged from 0.76 to 0.94, with overall reliability at 0.83. The developed instrument demonstrated acceptable and promising psychometric properties and cultural relevance for evaluating conflict management competencies among surgical residents in Iran. It offers a valid and preliminary framework for assessing residents’ ability to manage interpersonal and organizational conflicts in clinical contexts.

BMC Medical Education
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.