A Comparative Study of Doppler‐Guided Acute Bone Shortening‐Lengthening Versus Bone Transport for Infected Tibial Defects Combined With Soft Tissue Defects

OBJECTIVE: The management of infected tibial bone defects with soft tissue defects (ITBD-STD) remains challenging. This study aims to establish a Doppler-guided safety threshold for acute shortening (≤ 3 cm), compare the clinical efficacy and safety of shortening-lengthening (S-L) versus bone transport (BT), quantify the complication burden, and clarify the calculation indices. METHODS: test. RESULTS: The WHT in the S-L group was significantly shorter than that in the BT group (68.5 ± 25.2 vs. 85.2 ± 21.5 days, p < 0.05). In the S-L group, acute shortening was successfully performed in all 22 patients under real-time Doppler guidance, with a mean acute shortening distance of 2.8 ± 0.4 cm (capped at 3 cm). No patient experienced Doppler signal loss or required intraoperative termination of shortening due to vascular compromise. The BHI (37.36 ± 10.73 vs. 44.14 ± 11.12 days/cm) and EFI (45.36 ± 11.23 vs. 53.52 ± 12.55 days/cm) in the S-L group were significantly lower than those in the BT group (all p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups (45.5% vs. 42.9%, p > 0.05). At the final follow-up, there was also no statistically significant difference in ASAMI scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both S-L and BT are effective for ITBD-STD with comparable safety. Under the strict Doppler-guided protocol (≤ 3 cm), S-L significantly shortens WHT without increasing complications, yet this benefit is design-inherent rather than a biological advantage. Given comparable ASAMI functional outcomes, S-L offers no functional superiority over BT. Nonetheless, the Doppler criteria and selection strategy established herein provide a safe, reproducible framework for technique selection, validating the clinical feasibility of acute shortening without compromising final function or safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Surgery
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70409
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Doppler‐Guided Acute Bone Shortening‐Lengthening Versus Bone Transport for Infected Tibial Defects Combined With Soft Tissue Defects

Chengkuo Cai, Guoqi Ji, Zhiming Zhao, Weiguo Xu
Orthopaedic Surgery
Bone fractures and treatments
article

A Comparative Study of Doppler‐Guided Acute Bone Shortening‐Lengthening Versus Bone Transport for Infected Tibial Defects Combined With Soft Tissue Defects

Chengkuo Cai, Guoqi Ji, Zhiming Zhao, Weiguo Xu
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The management of infected tibial bone defects with soft tissue defects (ITBD-STD) remains challenging. This study aims to establish a Doppler-guided safety threshold for acute shortening (≤ 3 cm), compare the clinical efficacy and safety of shortening-lengthening (S-L) versus bone transport (BT), quantify the complication burden, and clarify the calculation indices. METHODS: test. RESULTS: The WHT in the S-L group was significantly shorter than that in the BT group (68.5 ± 25.2 vs. 85.2 ± 21.5 days, p < 0.05). In the S-L group, acute shortening was successfully performed in all 22 patients under real-time Doppler guidance, with a mean acute shortening distance of 2.8 ± 0.4 cm (capped at 3 cm). No patient experienced Doppler signal loss or required intraoperative termination of shortening due to vascular compromise. The BHI (37.36 ± 10.73 vs. 44.14 ± 11.12 days/cm) and EFI (45.36 ± 11.23 vs. 53.52 ± 12.55 days/cm) in the S-L group were significantly lower than those in the BT group (all p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups (45.5% vs. 42.9%, p > 0.05). At the final follow-up, there was also no statistically significant difference in ASAMI scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both S-L and BT are effective for ITBD-STD with comparable safety. Under the strict Doppler-guided protocol (≤ 3 cm), S-L significantly shortens WHT without increasing complications, yet this benefit is design-inherent rather than a biological advantage. Given comparable ASAMI functional outcomes, S-L offers no functional superiority over BT. Nonetheless, the Doppler criteria and selection strategy established herein provide a safe, reproducible framework for technique selection, validating the clinical feasibility of acute shortening without compromising final function or safety.

Orthopaedic Surgery
Tianjin Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of Doppler‐Guided Acute Bone Shortening‐Lengthening Versus Bone Transport for Infected Tibial Defects Combined With Soft Tissue Defects — Chengkuo Cai, Guoqi Ji, et al. · Orthopaedic Surgery (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS