(What) do we want collective attention to be?

Abstract This paper takes a broadly pragmatist, rather than metaphysical, approach to collective attention. So, I ask not whether collective attention really exists and what it is, but whether and how we should ascribe attention to collectives. Focusing on the attribution of attention to whole societies, I argue that certain collective-level phenomena are analogous to aspects of individual attention: selection for action, the structuring of consciousness into foreground and background, and the allocation of cognitive resources to a task. We can therefore improve our understanding of the relevant collective-level phenomena by thinking of them as aspects of the collective’s attention. On the other hand, we should refrain from becoming uncritically immersed in the analogy. In particular, we should resist the idea of “society” as an extremely important agent whose attention should be organized so as to best pursue its legitimate goals, even when this conflicts with the interests of its individual human constituents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05784-7
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(What) do we want collective attention to be?

Eve Kitsik
Synthese
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

(What) do we want collective attention to be?

Eve Kitsik
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper takes a broadly pragmatist, rather than metaphysical, approach to collective attention. So, I ask not whether collective attention really exists and what it is, but whether and how we should ascribe attention to collectives. Focusing on the attribution of attention to whole societies, I argue that certain collective-level phenomena are analogous to aspects of individual attention: selection for action, the structuring of consciousness into foreground and background, and the allocation of cognitive resources to a task. We can therefore improve our understanding of the relevant collective-level phenomena by thinking of them as aspects of the collective’s attention. On the other hand, we should refrain from becoming uncritically immersed in the analogy. In particular, we should resist the idea of “society” as an extremely important agent whose attention should be organized so as to best pursue its legitimate goals, even when this conflicts with the interests of its individual human constituents.

SyntheseVol. 208(3)
University of Vienna (AT)
Austrian Science Fund, Universität Wien
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.