Potential for Genomics to Help Guide Preventive Strategies in Psychiatry

Importance: Psychiatric disorders are a major source of disability and premature mortality worldwide. Advances in genomics have clarified parts of their genetic architecture, prompting questions about whether genomic information can inform preventive strategies for psychiatric disorders in clinical practice. This Special Communication describes potential benefits and harms of using genomic information, particularly polygenic scores (PGSs) and rare variants, to guide prevention in psychiatry. Observations: Broad application of genomic testing in universal or selective primary prevention is not currently supported by evidence of net clinical benefit, given modest absolute risk differences, limited individual-level predictive performance, and the potential for psychological harm. The possible value of genomic testing increases for indicated primary prevention, as prior probability rises and diagnostic uncertainty becomes clinically relevant. The most compelling opportunity lies in early care after individuals enter the psychiatric treatment system but before diagnostic trajectories fully crystallize. In this zone of diagnostic uncertainty, testing for rare, high-impact variants can shorten diagnostic delays, inform prognosis, and guide monitoring and treatment, provided that results are communicated appropriately. PGSs may contribute to risk stratification when applied in high-risk clinical populations and integrated with nongenetic factors. In secondary and tertiary prevention, pharmacogenomics provides actionable benefits for medication choice and safety, and rare variant testing has clear value in selected instances. Beyond psychiatric outcomes, genomic testing could potentially help address the profound mortality gap in severe mental illness by identifying elevated risk for somatic comorbidities, thus supporting more proactive, integrated care. Conclusions and Relevance: Currently, genomic testing in psychiatry should not be used for population-wide screening but may have value as a targeted clinical resource whose utility depends on timing, context, and purpose. When applied judiciously and embedded within comprehensive, ethically grounded care pathways, genomic testing holds promise as one component of a more precise, preventive, and patient-centered psychiatry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.2583
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential for Genomics to Help Guide Preventive Strategies in Psychiatry

Vincent Millischer, Giuseppe Fanelli, Philip R. Jansen, Evangelos Vassos et al.
JAMA Psychiatry
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Potential for Genomics to Help Guide Preventive Strategies in Psychiatry

Vincent Millischer, Giuseppe Fanelli, Philip R. Jansen, Evangelos Vassos, Wouter J. Peyrot, Katherine L. Musliner, Jurjen Luykx, Kimberley M. Kendall, Boris Chaumette, Sergi Papiol, Andreas J. Forstner, Eva C. Schulte, Gerome Breen
article en

Abstract

Importance: Psychiatric disorders are a major source of disability and premature mortality worldwide. Advances in genomics have clarified parts of their genetic architecture, prompting questions about whether genomic information can inform preventive strategies for psychiatric disorders in clinical practice. This Special Communication describes potential benefits and harms of using genomic information, particularly polygenic scores (PGSs) and rare variants, to guide prevention in psychiatry. Observations: Broad application of genomic testing in universal or selective primary prevention is not currently supported by evidence of net clinical benefit, given modest absolute risk differences, limited individual-level predictive performance, and the potential for psychological harm. The possible value of genomic testing increases for indicated primary prevention, as prior probability rises and diagnostic uncertainty becomes clinically relevant. The most compelling opportunity lies in early care after individuals enter the psychiatric treatment system but before diagnostic trajectories fully crystallize. In this zone of diagnostic uncertainty, testing for rare, high-impact variants can shorten diagnostic delays, inform prognosis, and guide monitoring and treatment, provided that results are communicated appropriately. PGSs may contribute to risk stratification when applied in high-risk clinical populations and integrated with nongenetic factors. In secondary and tertiary prevention, pharmacogenomics provides actionable benefits for medication choice and safety, and rare variant testing has clear value in selected instances. Beyond psychiatric outcomes, genomic testing could potentially help address the profound mortality gap in severe mental illness by identifying elevated risk for somatic comorbidities, thus supporting more proactive, integrated care. Conclusions and Relevance: Currently, genomic testing in psychiatry should not be used for population-wide screening but may have value as a targeted clinical resource whose utility depends on timing, context, and purpose. When applied judiciously and embedded within comprehensive, ethically grounded care pathways, genomic testing holds promise as one component of a more precise, preventive, and patient-centered psychiatry.

JAMA Psychiatry
University of Udine (IT), Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), King's College London (GB), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Aarhus University (DK), Université Paris Cité (FR), University Hospital Bonn (DE), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Maastricht University (NL), Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), German Center for Infection Research (DE), GGZ inGeest (NL), FHU Neurovasc (FR), Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), NeuroDiderot (FR), Institut für Psychiatrische Phänomik und Genomik (DE), McGill University (CA), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Cardiff University (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.