Impacts of a partial welfare reform on targeting and political competition

Over the past decade, India’s BJP-led national government has undertaken various reforms to welfare programs, aiming to reduce the scope for local officials to manipulate beneficiary selection or divert funds. Nevertheless state and local governments retained considerable discretion over beneficiary selection and the local delivery of central government funded welfare benefits, and have maintained exclusive control over state-funded programs. We use longitudinal household survey data from the state of West Bengal to evaluate the effects of these reforms on pro-poor targeting of welfare programs, and political competition between the BJP and the TMC, the incumbent political party in the state. We find that welfare programs were better targeted toward poorer and socially disadvantaged households in the period 2014–2018 than in 2010–2013. However the welfare reforms do not explain why the BJP’s vote share increased, as its electoral gains from the new nationwide programs were outweighed by their losses, stemming from the increased support for the TMC from recipients of new state and pre-existing benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economics
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105762
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impacts of a partial welfare reform on targeting and political competition

S. Mitra, S. Visaria, D. Mookherjee, P. Maitra
Journal of Public Economics
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Impacts of a partial welfare reform on targeting and political competition

S. Mitra, S. Visaria, D. Mookherjee, P. Maitra
article en

Abstract

Over the past decade, India’s BJP-led national government has undertaken various reforms to welfare programs, aiming to reduce the scope for local officials to manipulate beneficiary selection or divert funds. Nevertheless state and local governments retained considerable discretion over beneficiary selection and the local delivery of central government funded welfare benefits, and have maintained exclusive control over state-funded programs. We use longitudinal household survey data from the state of West Bengal to evaluate the effects of these reforms on pro-poor targeting of welfare programs, and political competition between the BJP and the TMC, the incumbent political party in the state. We find that welfare programs were better targeted toward poorer and socially disadvantaged households in the period 2014–2018 than in 2010–2013. However the welfare reforms do not explain why the BJP’s vote share increased, as its electoral gains from the new nationwide programs were outweighed by their losses, stemming from the increased support for the TMC from recipients of new state and pre-existing benefits.

Journal of Public EconomicsVol. 262
Boston University (US), St George's, University of London (GB), City, University of London (GB), Monash University (AU), Indian Statistical Institute (IN)
United States Agency for International Development, Monash University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.