Nonprofit resilience building in turbulent times: towards a process model

Abstract Amid weakening institutional environments, fiscal retrenchment, and rising demand for social services, nonprofit organizations (NPOs) worldwide face a fundamental challenge of how to build resilience in their organizations without compromising mission accountability. This article introduces a process model of NPO resilience built around three stages: anticipation, coping, and adaptation. Moving beyond the dominant outcome- and capability-based accounts that have characterized the literature to date, this model specifies how three mechanisms drive this process: (1) accumulating slack resources for shock absorption and experimentation, (2) exercising entrepreneurial judgment for calibrating risk under uncertainty, and (3) empowering frontline responsiveness through dynamic delegation. Crucially, the article situates these mechanisms within broader public policy and governance contexts. Drawing on empirical insights from diverse organizations and institutions, we identify key policy enablers: funding rules that allow the financing of operating reserves, trust-based contracting that balances managerial discretion with oversight, and capacity-building investment in data systems. As part of this process model, we reframe “mission drift” as adaptive mission respecification, arguing that, with clear governance guardrails, strategic pivots preserve rather than erode social value. This study provides a comprehensive roadmap for nonprofit leaders, policy makers, and funders seeking to build nonprofit resilience in turbulent environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Public Policy and Governance
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-026-00155-x
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonprofit resilience building in turbulent times: towards a process model

Aureliu Sindila, Xueyong Zhan, Yong Jin
Global Public Policy and Governance
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Nonprofit resilience building in turbulent times: towards a process model

Aureliu Sindila, Xueyong Zhan, Yong Jin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Amid weakening institutional environments, fiscal retrenchment, and rising demand for social services, nonprofit organizations (NPOs) worldwide face a fundamental challenge of how to build resilience in their organizations without compromising mission accountability. This article introduces a process model of NPO resilience built around three stages: anticipation, coping, and adaptation. Moving beyond the dominant outcome- and capability-based accounts that have characterized the literature to date, this model specifies how three mechanisms drive this process: (1) accumulating slack resources for shock absorption and experimentation, (2) exercising entrepreneurial judgment for calibrating risk under uncertainty, and (3) empowering frontline responsiveness through dynamic delegation. Crucially, the article situates these mechanisms within broader public policy and governance contexts. Drawing on empirical insights from diverse organizations and institutions, we identify key policy enablers: funding rules that allow the financing of operating reserves, trust-based contracting that balances managerial discretion with oversight, and capacity-building investment in data systems. As part of this process model, we reframe “mission drift” as adaptive mission respecification, arguing that, with clear governance guardrails, strategic pivots preserve rather than erode social value. This study provides a comprehensive roadmap for nonprofit leaders, policy makers, and funders seeking to build nonprofit resilience in turbulent environments.

Global Public Policy and Governance
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.