Global market interconnectedness: how risks travel during global financial and non-financial crises

Purpose This study aims to investigate the dynamic interconnectedness and risk transmission mechanisms among major global equity indices over a comprehensive period (1997–2024). By spanning nearly three decades, the research distinguishes how systemic risk propagates during both financial and non-financial global crises. Design/methodology/approach The analysis uses a Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressive (TVP-VAR) framework. This methodology allows for the capture of evolving connectedness patterns and shifts in spillover intensity across different market regimes, providing a granular view of how return shocks transition between stability and turbulence. Findings The results reveal that financial crises, notably the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, are characterized by intense linkages centered around developed markets (S&P 500, DAX, FTSE 100), which act as primary transmitters of systemic risk. In contrast, emerging markets (KOSPI, IBOVESPA) predominantly function as shock absorbers. Non-financial crises display distinct transmission signatures: the COVID-19 pandemic triggered universal spillovers, while geopolitical events, such as the Russia-Ukraine war, localized risk within European indices (DAX, CAC 40). Additionally, the Dotcom Bubble underscored the role of sector-specific volatility, with the NASDAQ serving as the epicenter of contagion. Originality/value This research contributes to the literature by providing a long-term comparative taxonomy of risk transmission across diverse crisis types. By isolating the idiosyncratic behaviors of markets during financial versus non-financial shocks, the findings offer critical insights for institutional investors and policymakers regarding portfolio diversification and the limits of financial resilience in an increasingly integrated global economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Economics and Finance
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-01-2026-0016
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global market interconnectedness: how risks travel during global financial and non-financial crises

Ujkan Q. Bajra, Kestrim Avdimetaj, Florin Aliu, Ejup Fejza
Studies in Economics and Finance
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
article

Global market interconnectedness: how risks travel during global financial and non-financial crises

Ujkan Q. Bajra, Kestrim Avdimetaj, Florin Aliu, Ejup Fejza
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the dynamic interconnectedness and risk transmission mechanisms among major global equity indices over a comprehensive period (1997–2024). By spanning nearly three decades, the research distinguishes how systemic risk propagates during both financial and non-financial global crises. Design/methodology/approach The analysis uses a Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressive (TVP-VAR) framework. This methodology allows for the capture of evolving connectedness patterns and shifts in spillover intensity across different market regimes, providing a granular view of how return shocks transition between stability and turbulence. Findings The results reveal that financial crises, notably the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, are characterized by intense linkages centered around developed markets (S&P 500, DAX, FTSE 100), which act as primary transmitters of systemic risk. In contrast, emerging markets (KOSPI, IBOVESPA) predominantly function as shock absorbers. Non-financial crises display distinct transmission signatures: the COVID-19 pandemic triggered universal spillovers, while geopolitical events, such as the Russia-Ukraine war, localized risk within European indices (DAX, CAC 40). Additionally, the Dotcom Bubble underscored the role of sector-specific volatility, with the NASDAQ serving as the epicenter of contagion. Originality/value This research contributes to the literature by providing a long-term comparative taxonomy of risk transmission across diverse crisis types. By isolating the idiosyncratic behaviors of markets during financial versus non-financial shocks, the findings offer critical insights for institutional investors and policymakers regarding portfolio diversification and the limits of financial resilience in an increasingly integrated global economy.

Studies in Economics and Finance
University for Business and Technology (XK), University of Prishtina (XK)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.