Assessing curvilinear sprint performance in basketball: The role of stretch-shortening cycle and isometric force-time metrics

Recent research emphasizes the importance of multidirectional movements in basketball. This cross-sectional study examines the differences in stretch-shortening cycle function, strength qualities, and dynamic and isometric force-time characteristics between basketball players with faster and slower curvilinear sprint (CS) performance. Forty-five competitive young male basketball players performed a basketball-specific three-point CS test and were divided into fast (n = 22) and slow (n = 23) groups based on their best CS times. Drop jump (DJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) tests were used to calculate the various force-time curve metrics. Independent samples Welch's t-tests with Hedges' g effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were used to compare the force-time metrics between the two groups. In the DJ test, significant between-group differences (p < 0.05) with moderate to large effect sizes were observed in ground contact time (g=-0.896, 95% CI [-93.23, -19.28] ms) and its subphases (braking phase time and propulsion phase time), reactive strength index (g = 0.899, 95% CI [0.10, 0.49] m/s), and five other force-time metrics such as take-off peak force in body weight (g = 0.849, 95% CI [0.24, 1.33] BW). In the CMJ test, significant differences were mostly observed in braking-related metrics, including mean braking power (g = 0.789, 95% CI [0.52, 3.76] W/kg) and mean braking force (g = 0.732, 95% CI [0.03, 0.32] BW). In the IMTP test, no significant between-group differences were found in peak force (p = 0.224, g = 0.392), whereas all rate of force development (RFD) metrics showed significant differences with large to very large effect sizes (g = 0.822-1.407). The largest effect was observed for RFD at 150 ms (g = 1.407, 95% CI [1258.68, 3427.52] N/s), which closely matches previously reported ground contact times during CS, highlighting the importance of rapid force production within the brief contact phase that represents the sole window for actively modifying body momentum during locomotion. These findings suggest that DJ reactive strength index, CMJ braking force-time characteristics, and the rate of reaching maximal isometric force, rather than maximal isometric strength itself, in the IMTP test distinguish CS performance in male junior basketball players.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356775
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing curvilinear sprint performance in basketball: The role of stretch-shortening cycle and isometric force-time metrics

Evrim Ünver, Caner Mavili, Alpan Cinemre, Ekrem YILMAZ et al.
PLoS ONE
Sports Performance and Training
article

Assessing curvilinear sprint performance in basketball: The role of stretch-shortening cycle and isometric force-time metrics

Evrim Ünver, Caner Mavili, Alpan Cinemre, Ekrem YILMAZ, Huseyin Celik
article en

Abstract

Recent research emphasizes the importance of multidirectional movements in basketball. This cross-sectional study examines the differences in stretch-shortening cycle function, strength qualities, and dynamic and isometric force-time characteristics between basketball players with faster and slower curvilinear sprint (CS) performance. Forty-five competitive young male basketball players performed a basketball-specific three-point CS test and were divided into fast (n = 22) and slow (n = 23) groups based on their best CS times. Drop jump (DJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) tests were used to calculate the various force-time curve metrics. Independent samples Welch's t-tests with Hedges' g effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were used to compare the force-time metrics between the two groups. In the DJ test, significant between-group differences (p < 0.05) with moderate to large effect sizes were observed in ground contact time (g=-0.896, 95% CI [-93.23, -19.28] ms) and its subphases (braking phase time and propulsion phase time), reactive strength index (g = 0.899, 95% CI [0.10, 0.49] m/s), and five other force-time metrics such as take-off peak force in body weight (g = 0.849, 95% CI [0.24, 1.33] BW). In the CMJ test, significant differences were mostly observed in braking-related metrics, including mean braking power (g = 0.789, 95% CI [0.52, 3.76] W/kg) and mean braking force (g = 0.732, 95% CI [0.03, 0.32] BW). In the IMTP test, no significant between-group differences were found in peak force (p = 0.224, g = 0.392), whereas all rate of force development (RFD) metrics showed significant differences with large to very large effect sizes (g = 0.822-1.407). The largest effect was observed for RFD at 150 ms (g = 1.407, 95% CI [1258.68, 3427.52] N/s), which closely matches previously reported ground contact times during CS, highlighting the importance of rapid force production within the brief contact phase that represents the sole window for actively modifying body momentum during locomotion. These findings suggest that DJ reactive strength index, CMJ braking force-time characteristics, and the rate of reaching maximal isometric force, rather than maximal isometric strength itself, in the IMTP test distinguish CS performance in male junior basketball players.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
Ahi Evran University (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, Hacettepe Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.