Time, waiting, and the politics of delay in Gaza during genocide

Abstract This study examines how war reorganizes temporal experience through the politics of waiting, delay, and suspended life in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. Drawing on a qualitative, interpretive design grounded in decolonial feminist and critical temporal perspectives, the study explores how civilians living under conditions of continuous violence experience and make sense of time in their everyday lives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between September 2024 and March 2025 with thirty displaced participants residing in internally displaced settings across Gaza during the ongoing genocidal campaign following October 2023. The findings reveal that time in Gaza is not experienced as linear or progressive, but as fragmented, suspended, and increasingly detached from future orientation. Six interrelated themes were identified: (1) time as suspended life, (2) waiting for death rather than rescue, (3) waiting as a mechanism of control and exhaustion, (4) time measured through loss, (5) the collapse of the future into an endless present, and (6) temporal fatigue and hopelessness associated with prolonged, unresolved waiting. Across these themes, waiting emerges not as a passive interval but as a structured and politically mediated condition that shapes emotional, psychological, and social life. The study argues that temporality itself operates as a dimension of power in contexts of protracted conflict, where the regulation of delay, uncertainty, and interruption contributes to the governance of civilian populations. By integrating insights from necropolitical theory, decolonial feminism, and critical psychology, the study reframes waiting as a central modality of violence rather than a byproduct of crisis. The findings contribute to interdisciplinary debates on war, temporality, and mental health, highlighting the need for analytical frameworks that account for the lived experience of time under conditions of sustained structural violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Subjectivity
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-026-00250-8
Primary Topic
Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time, waiting, and the politics of delay in Gaza during genocide

Guido Veronese, Fayez Mahamid, Bilal Hamamra
Subjectivity
Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
article

Time, waiting, and the politics of delay in Gaza during genocide

Guido Veronese, Fayez Mahamid, Bilal Hamamra
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how war reorganizes temporal experience through the politics of waiting, delay, and suspended life in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. Drawing on a qualitative, interpretive design grounded in decolonial feminist and critical temporal perspectives, the study explores how civilians living under conditions of continuous violence experience and make sense of time in their everyday lives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between September 2024 and March 2025 with thirty displaced participants residing in internally displaced settings across Gaza during the ongoing genocidal campaign following October 2023. The findings reveal that time in Gaza is not experienced as linear or progressive, but as fragmented, suspended, and increasingly detached from future orientation. Six interrelated themes were identified: (1) time as suspended life, (2) waiting for death rather than rescue, (3) waiting as a mechanism of control and exhaustion, (4) time measured through loss, (5) the collapse of the future into an endless present, and (6) temporal fatigue and hopelessness associated with prolonged, unresolved waiting. Across these themes, waiting emerges not as a passive interval but as a structured and politically mediated condition that shapes emotional, psychological, and social life. The study argues that temporality itself operates as a dimension of power in contexts of protracted conflict, where the regulation of delay, uncertainty, and interruption contributes to the governance of civilian populations. By integrating insights from necropolitical theory, decolonial feminism, and critical psychology, the study reframes waiting as a central modality of violence rather than a byproduct of crisis. The findings contribute to interdisciplinary debates on war, temporality, and mental health, highlighting the need for analytical frameworks that account for the lived experience of time under conditions of sustained structural violence.

Subjectivity
An-Najah National University (PS), Stellenbosch University (ZA), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.