Delphi expert consensus on phlebotomy limitations and treatment challenges in HFE -related hemochromatosis

HFE -related hemochromatosis (HC) is caused by hepcidin dysregulation and is characterized by excessive iron absorption and accumulation in the liver, heart, and endocrine glands, which leads to complications including arthropathy, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Standard of care (SoC) typically involves phlebotomy, with iron chelators used less frequently. However, these therapies may cause side effects and negatively impact quality of life, making them troublesome for some patients. Using the Delphi methodology, a survey was developed to identify unmet needs and clinical challenges within the current therapeutic landscape of HC, and to establish consensus statements for its management. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. Thirty-two HC specialists from Europe, Australia and the USA responded to the survey. After three rounds of survey refinement, final consensus statements were compiled. The Delphi process identified key unmet needs in HC, including lack of alternatives to phlebotomy, persistent symptoms, and burden related to the use of current SoC. The consensus process helped establish definitions for high phlebotomy treatment burden, intolerance, and suboptimal response to phlebotomy. The process also identified the subgroup of patients overly burdened by phlebotomy. Patient-reported outcomes were considered key to assessing phlebotomy’s impact, although they are rarely measured in clinical practice. The Delphi study highlighted the limitations of phlebotomy, with respondents identifying a high unmet need for patients who cannot be managed with or do not tolerate this approach. The study suggested exploring alternative therapy options for patients who experience high treatment burden or intolerance to phlebotomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Hematology International
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.166769
Primary Topic
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delphi expert consensus on phlebotomy limitations and treatment challenges in HFE -related hemochromatosis

Soraya Benchikh El Fegoun, Dominik J. Schaer, Jeremy R. Shearman, Charlotte Pollet et al.
Clinical Hematology International
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
article

Delphi expert consensus on phlebotomy limitations and treatment challenges in HFE -related hemochromatosis

Soraya Benchikh El Fegoun, Dominik J. Schaer, Jeremy R. Shearman, Charlotte Pollet, Uta Merle, Sant‐Rayn Pasricha, Kris V. Kowdley, Domenico Girelli, John K. Olynyk, Gregory J. Kato, Sonya Abraham
article en

Abstract

HFE -related hemochromatosis (HC) is caused by hepcidin dysregulation and is characterized by excessive iron absorption and accumulation in the liver, heart, and endocrine glands, which leads to complications including arthropathy, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Standard of care (SoC) typically involves phlebotomy, with iron chelators used less frequently. However, these therapies may cause side effects and negatively impact quality of life, making them troublesome for some patients. Using the Delphi methodology, a survey was developed to identify unmet needs and clinical challenges within the current therapeutic landscape of HC, and to establish consensus statements for its management. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. Thirty-two HC specialists from Europe, Australia and the USA responded to the survey. After three rounds of survey refinement, final consensus statements were compiled. The Delphi process identified key unmet needs in HC, including lack of alternatives to phlebotomy, persistent symptoms, and burden related to the use of current SoC. The consensus process helped establish definitions for high phlebotomy treatment burden, intolerance, and suboptimal response to phlebotomy. The process also identified the subgroup of patients overly burdened by phlebotomy. Patient-reported outcomes were considered key to assessing phlebotomy’s impact, although they are rarely measured in clinical practice. The Delphi study highlighted the limitations of phlebotomy, with respondents identifying a high unmet need for patients who cannot be managed with or do not tolerate this approach. The study suggested exploring alternative therapy options for patients who experience high treatment burden or intolerance to phlebotomy.

Clinical Hematology InternationalVol. 8(3)
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU), Curtin University (AU), Heidelberg University (DE), Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Vifor Pharma (Switzerland) (CH), CSL (United States) (US), Liver Institute Northwest (US), South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust (GB), CSL (Switzerland) (CH), Washington State University (US), Georgia Highlands College (US)
Falk Foundation, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, CSL Behring, CytoSorbents Europe
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.