Global Prevalence and Correlates of Stigma in Long COVID: A Systematic Scoping Review of Quantitative Evidence

Long COVID is a multisystem syndrome with a high global prevalence that impacts the physical and psychosocial well-being of affected individuals. While its clinical manifestations are well-documented, the illness-related stigma as an emerging topic remains poorly characterized from a quantitative perspective. This scoping review aimed to map the global quantitative evidence regarding the prevalence, manifestation, psychometric assessment, and factors associated with stigma in individuals with Long COVID. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Arksey and O’Malley framework. Quantitative empirical studies examining stigma in Long COVID populations worldwide were included. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Out of 809 identified documents, eight articles published between 2022 and 2026 that met the selection criteria were included, representing 2925 participants. The findings revealed a high prevalence of stigma (75.9% to 83%), manifesting mainly in anticipated and internalized forms (64.2% to 90.8%). Three primary measurement tools were identified, with the Long-COVID Stigma Scale emerging as the most widely validated and used instrument. Higher levels of stigma were significantly associated with poorer mental health, lower quality of life, and reduced well-being. The psychologization of symptoms was associated with increased stigma, while self-related processes (such as self-coldness and reduced self-compassion) appeared to mediate its negative impact on well-being. Furthermore, a preliminary stigma vulnerability profile was identified, highlighting women, younger individuals, and those with a formal Long COVID clinical diagnosis as experiencing higher stigma levels. Stigma appears to be a central component of the illness experience in Long COVID, carrying important public health and psychosocial implications. Our findings underscore the need for coordinated and multisectoral public health research efforts to address this stigma and improve patient well-being. This research agenda should include studies evaluating population-level socio-educational campaigns to raise awareness about Long COVID stigma, the integration of stigma-informed training into clinical protocols, and the potential value of incorporating validated psychometric screening instruments into routine practice to evaluate their impact on vulnerable patient populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-026-00631-x
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Prevalence and Correlates of Stigma in Long COVID: A Systematic Scoping Review of Quantitative Evidence

Juan Antonio Becerra‐García, Sara Barbeito, Pedro Carlos Martínez-Suárez
Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Global Prevalence and Correlates of Stigma in Long COVID: A Systematic Scoping Review of Quantitative Evidence

Juan Antonio Becerra‐García, Sara Barbeito, Pedro Carlos Martínez-Suárez
article en

Abstract

Long COVID is a multisystem syndrome with a high global prevalence that impacts the physical and psychosocial well-being of affected individuals. While its clinical manifestations are well-documented, the illness-related stigma as an emerging topic remains poorly characterized from a quantitative perspective. This scoping review aimed to map the global quantitative evidence regarding the prevalence, manifestation, psychometric assessment, and factors associated with stigma in individuals with Long COVID. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Arksey and O’Malley framework. Quantitative empirical studies examining stigma in Long COVID populations worldwide were included. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Out of 809 identified documents, eight articles published between 2022 and 2026 that met the selection criteria were included, representing 2925 participants. The findings revealed a high prevalence of stigma (75.9% to 83%), manifesting mainly in anticipated and internalized forms (64.2% to 90.8%). Three primary measurement tools were identified, with the Long-COVID Stigma Scale emerging as the most widely validated and used instrument. Higher levels of stigma were significantly associated with poorer mental health, lower quality of life, and reduced well-being. The psychologization of symptoms was associated with increased stigma, while self-related processes (such as self-coldness and reduced self-compassion) appeared to mediate its negative impact on well-being. Furthermore, a preliminary stigma vulnerability profile was identified, highlighting women, younger individuals, and those with a formal Long COVID clinical diagnosis as experiencing higher stigma levels. Stigma appears to be a central component of the illness experience in Long COVID, carrying important public health and psychosocial implications. Our findings underscore the need for coordinated and multisectoral public health research efforts to address this stigma and improve patient well-being. This research agenda should include studies evaluating population-level socio-educational campaigns to raise awareness about Long COVID stigma, the integration of stigma-informed training into clinical protocols, and the potential value of incorporating validated psychometric screening instruments into routine practice to evaluate their impact on vulnerable patient populations.

Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (EC), Universidad Internacional De La Rioja (ES)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.