Dynamic Evaluation of Flood Hazard Considering Extreme Precipitation Scenarios: A Case Study of Laiyuan County, Hebei Province

Extreme precipitation events have grown more common as a result of global climate change, and conventional static hazard assessments find it difficult to account for the dynamic progression of flood disasters. This study considers extreme precipitation factors for different return times and creates different extreme precipitation scenarios based on multiyear historical precipitation data and actual storm events. The study proposes a method for the dynamic assessment of regional flood hazard that takes extreme rainfall scenarios into account by simulating the dynamic flood inundation processes under each scenario using the Accumulated Runoff and Flood Estimation Model (AccRo v.1.0), iterative flow accumulation, and hydrological calculations. A dynamic assessment and zoning of flood hazards was carried out in Laiyuan County, Hebei Province. The results reveal that high-hazard zones coincide with the distribution of historically badly damaged townships, concentrated in the river valley plains along the Juma River. The results show that spatial patterns are simultaneously influenced by precipitation, terrain, and the river network. In the temporal dimension, under Scenario 3, the superimposition of the 50-year return period daily maximum rainfall at the 12th hour increased the high-hazard area by approximately 110% compared with that at the 11th hour. In addition, the non-uniform multi-peak rainfall pattern in Scenario 4 represented the rise, peak, and recession stages of the flood process. A combined assessment of water depth and flow velocity can effectively distinguish between two disaster-causing modes—deep water with low flow velocity and shallow water with high flow velocity—thereby addressing the underestimation of hazard in transition zones associated with the use of water depth as a single indicator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17090826
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Evaluation of Flood Hazard Considering Extreme Precipitation Scenarios: A Case Study of Laiyuan County, Hebei Province

Lijuan Li, Wei Chen, Shengyuan Xu, Yanan Li et al.
Atmosphere
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

Dynamic Evaluation of Flood Hazard Considering Extreme Precipitation Scenarios: A Case Study of Laiyuan County, Hebei Province

Lijuan Li, Wei Chen, Shengyuan Xu, Yanan Li, Yuan Li, Feng Liu, Yuting Qing, Deqiang Shi, Rui Zhang, Ziliang Zhao, Yu Xiong, Weihua Lu, Yiyun Zhao, Shengxi Cao
article en

Abstract

Extreme precipitation events have grown more common as a result of global climate change, and conventional static hazard assessments find it difficult to account for the dynamic progression of flood disasters. This study considers extreme precipitation factors for different return times and creates different extreme precipitation scenarios based on multiyear historical precipitation data and actual storm events. The study proposes a method for the dynamic assessment of regional flood hazard that takes extreme rainfall scenarios into account by simulating the dynamic flood inundation processes under each scenario using the Accumulated Runoff and Flood Estimation Model (AccRo v.1.0), iterative flow accumulation, and hydrological calculations. A dynamic assessment and zoning of flood hazards was carried out in Laiyuan County, Hebei Province. The results reveal that high-hazard zones coincide with the distribution of historically badly damaged townships, concentrated in the river valley plains along the Juma River. The results show that spatial patterns are simultaneously influenced by precipitation, terrain, and the river network. In the temporal dimension, under Scenario 3, the superimposition of the 50-year return period daily maximum rainfall at the 12th hour increased the high-hazard area by approximately 110% compared with that at the 11th hour. In addition, the non-uniform multi-peak rainfall pattern in Scenario 4 represented the rise, peak, and recession stages of the flood process. A combined assessment of water depth and flow velocity can effectively distinguish between two disaster-causing modes—deep water with low flow velocity and shallow water with high flow velocity—thereby addressing the underestimation of hazard in transition zones associated with the use of water depth as a single indicator.

AtmosphereVol. 17(9)
Shijiazhuang University (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), HBIS (China) (CN), Computer Emergency Response Team (FR), Hebei University of Architecture (CN), Hebei Institute of Physical Education (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.