Emotional childhood trauma, attachment dimensions, and depression severity in women with major depressive disorder

Childhood trauma is a well-established risk factor for depression in adulthood. However, its clinical correlates may differ according to trauma subtype and patient population. In women with major depressive disorder, attachment-related interpersonal patterns may be relevant to understanding variation in depressive symptom severity. This study examined childhood trauma subtypes, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, and depression severity in adult women with major depressive disorder. This cross-sectional study included 120 adult women with major depressive disorder who had not yet initiated pharmacological or psychotherapeutic treatment for the current depressive episode. Participants completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-33, the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale–Short Form, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Spearman correlation analyses were used to examine bivariate relationships among study variables. Exploratory cross-sectional indirect association models with 5,000 bootstrap resamples were estimated to examine whether attachment dimensions statistically accounted for the associations between childhood trauma subtypes and depression severity. The mean age of participants was 35.85 years (SD = 12.53), and the mean PHQ-9 score was 16.48 (SD = 5.03). Overall childhood trauma was correlated with PHQ-9 scores (ρ = 0.246, p < 0.01). Among trauma subtypes, emotional abuse (ρ = 0.203, p < 0.05), physical abuse (ρ = 0.246, p < 0.01), and emotional neglect (ρ = 0.236, p < 0.01) were correlated with PHQ-9 scores. In exploratory indirect association models, attachment anxiety showed indirect estimates with confidence intervals excluding zero for emotional abuse (B = 0.042, 95% CI [0.003, 0.111]) and emotional neglect (B = 0.037, 95% CI [0.004, 0.101]). Attachment avoidance showed indirect estimates with confidence intervals excluding zero for emotional abuse (B = 0.037, 95% CI [0.001, 0.112]), physical abuse (B = 0.061, 95% CI [0.001, 0.177]), sexual abuse (B = 0.092, 95% CI [0.009, 0.228]), and emotional neglect (B = 0.030, 95% CI [0.001, 0.091]). These findings suggest that attachment-related interpersonal processes may be relevant to the association between childhood trauma and depression severity in women with major depressive disorder. However, given the cross-sectional design and the exploratory nature of the indirect association analyses, the results should be interpreted cautiously and require replication in larger longitudinal studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05444-y
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional childhood trauma, attachment dimensions, and depression severity in women with major depressive disorder

Cansu Ünsal, Zeynep Nur Demirok, Zeliha Büşra Durgungöz, Canay PAMUKÇU ÜNLÜ et al.
BMC Psychology
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Emotional childhood trauma, attachment dimensions, and depression severity in women with major depressive disorder

Cansu Ünsal, Zeynep Nur Demirok, Zeliha Büşra Durgungöz, Canay PAMUKÇU ÜNLÜ, Meryem Aydin, Beyza Nur Tekiner Özcan
article en

Abstract

Childhood trauma is a well-established risk factor for depression in adulthood. However, its clinical correlates may differ according to trauma subtype and patient population. In women with major depressive disorder, attachment-related interpersonal patterns may be relevant to understanding variation in depressive symptom severity. This study examined childhood trauma subtypes, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, and depression severity in adult women with major depressive disorder. This cross-sectional study included 120 adult women with major depressive disorder who had not yet initiated pharmacological or psychotherapeutic treatment for the current depressive episode. Participants completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-33, the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale–Short Form, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Spearman correlation analyses were used to examine bivariate relationships among study variables. Exploratory cross-sectional indirect association models with 5,000 bootstrap resamples were estimated to examine whether attachment dimensions statistically accounted for the associations between childhood trauma subtypes and depression severity. The mean age of participants was 35.85 years (SD = 12.53), and the mean PHQ-9 score was 16.48 (SD = 5.03). Overall childhood trauma was correlated with PHQ-9 scores (ρ = 0.246, p < 0.01). Among trauma subtypes, emotional abuse (ρ = 0.203, p < 0.05), physical abuse (ρ = 0.246, p < 0.01), and emotional neglect (ρ = 0.236, p < 0.01) were correlated with PHQ-9 scores. In exploratory indirect association models, attachment anxiety showed indirect estimates with confidence intervals excluding zero for emotional abuse (B = 0.042, 95% CI [0.003, 0.111]) and emotional neglect (B = 0.037, 95% CI [0.004, 0.101]). Attachment avoidance showed indirect estimates with confidence intervals excluding zero for emotional abuse (B = 0.037, 95% CI [0.001, 0.112]), physical abuse (B = 0.061, 95% CI [0.001, 0.177]), sexual abuse (B = 0.092, 95% CI [0.009, 0.228]), and emotional neglect (B = 0.030, 95% CI [0.001, 0.091]). These findings suggest that attachment-related interpersonal processes may be relevant to the association between childhood trauma and depression severity in women with major depressive disorder. However, given the cross-sectional design and the exploratory nature of the indirect association analyses, the results should be interpreted cautiously and require replication in larger longitudinal studies.

BMC Psychology
Dr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.