Ethical frameworks and community engagement in HIV cure-related research at the end of life: looking back, moving forward

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: HIV cure-related research at the end-of-life has created a rare opportunity to study viral persistence in tissues that cannot be safely or repeatedly sampled during life. This review examines ethical frameworks and community engagement approaches in this field from 2016 to 2026, with attention to potential new scientific directions and implementation across diverse settings. RECENT FINDINGS: The literature has developed important recommendations on informed consent, autonomy, dignity, altruism, patient-participant-centeredness, next-of-kin/loved one involvement, staff coordination, rapid research autopsy, and tissue stewardship. Much of this work has emerged from the Last Gift program and related studies in the United States, with growing documented evidence from Canada and emerging biospecimen infrastructure work in Brazil. As the field expands toward novel approaches, such as organoids, organ-on-chip systems, ex vivo models, and possible in vivo testing of HIV cure-related research strategies, ethical questions increasingly extend to tissue transformation, future use, commercialization, acceptable risk, oversight, and long-term governance. SUMMARY: HIV cure-related research at the end-of-life has been ethically deliberate from the outset. The next task is to define the practices, safeguards, and engagement processes needed to conduct this work responsibly across more diverse cultural, legal, clinical, and community settings as scientific innovations evolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/coh.0000000000001066
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical frameworks and community engagement in HIV cure-related research at the end of life: looking back, moving forward

Whitney Tran, Cecilia Costiniuk, Zachary Sloane, Karine Dubé et al.
Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Ethical frameworks and community engagement in HIV cure-related research at the end of life: looking back, moving forward

Whitney Tran, Cecilia Costiniuk, Zachary Sloane, Karine Dubé, Ali Ahmed, Samuel Ndukwe
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: HIV cure-related research at the end-of-life has created a rare opportunity to study viral persistence in tissues that cannot be safely or repeatedly sampled during life. This review examines ethical frameworks and community engagement approaches in this field from 2016 to 2026, with attention to potential new scientific directions and implementation across diverse settings. RECENT FINDINGS: The literature has developed important recommendations on informed consent, autonomy, dignity, altruism, patient-participant-centeredness, next-of-kin/loved one involvement, staff coordination, rapid research autopsy, and tissue stewardship. Much of this work has emerged from the Last Gift program and related studies in the United States, with growing documented evidence from Canada and emerging biospecimen infrastructure work in Brazil. As the field expands toward novel approaches, such as organoids, organ-on-chip systems, ex vivo models, and possible in vivo testing of HIV cure-related research strategies, ethical questions increasingly extend to tissue transformation, future use, commercialization, acceptable risk, oversight, and long-term governance. SUMMARY: HIV cure-related research at the end-of-life has been ethically deliberate from the outset. The next task is to define the practices, safeguards, and engagement processes needed to conduct this work responsibly across more diverse cultural, legal, clinical, and community settings as scientific innovations evolve.

Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS
Gladstone Institutes (US), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), McGill University Health Centre (CA), University of California San Diego (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.