The intersection of chemokine signaling with the hallmarks of cancer in glioblastoma

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, is characterized by diffuse invasion, profound immunosuppression, treatment resistance, and near-inevitable recurrence. Although canonical genetic alterations establish malignant capacity, they do not fully explain how glioblastoma cells adapt to hypoxic, perivascular, invasive, immunosuppressive, metabolically constrained, and treatment-injured microenvironments. We examined how chemokine signaling contributes to these adaptive behaviors. METHODS: We used the hallmarks of cancer as an organizing framework to synthesize preclinical, translational, and clinical evidence on chemokine circuits in glioblastoma. We evaluated recurrent mechanistic pathways, distinguished causal functions from context-dependent biomarker associations, and assessed their therapeutic relevance. RESULTS: Chemokines act primarily as spatial and stress-responsive regulators rather than initiating oncogenic drivers. Recurrent circuits include CXCL12-CXCR4 in vascular repair, invasion, and stem-like persistence; CCL2 and CCL7 signaling through CCR2 in suppressive myeloid recruitment and metabolic-immune remodeling; CCL5-CCR5 in perivascular protection, invasion, and DNA-damage tolerance; and CXCL8 signaling through CXCR1 and CXCR2 in angiogenesis, immune evasion, and therapy-induced plasticity. Most chemokine-directed strategies remain preclinical or early translational. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic development should prioritize biomarker-defined dependencies and appropriately timed combinations that disrupt selected chemokine-dependent interactions within specific biological and treatment contexts. Clinical translation will require verification of target engagement, disruption of the relevant cellular interactions, and evidence that chemokine modulation improves treatment response or delays recurrence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-026-05768-0
Primary Topic
Chemokine receptors and signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The intersection of chemokine signaling with the hallmarks of cancer in glioblastoma

Rafał Chojak, Amy B. Heimberger, A. Karim Ahmed, Maciej S. Lesniak et al.
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Chemokine receptors and signaling
article

The intersection of chemokine signaling with the hallmarks of cancer in glioblastoma

Rafał Chojak, Amy B. Heimberger, A. Karim Ahmed, Maciej S. Lesniak, Hasaan A Kazi, Noah B. Drewes, Jawad Fares, Jason Miska, Lara Koutah, Jillyn R Turunen, Rebecca X Chen, Umme H Faisal, Clare Kelley, Ruochen Du
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, is characterized by diffuse invasion, profound immunosuppression, treatment resistance, and near-inevitable recurrence. Although canonical genetic alterations establish malignant capacity, they do not fully explain how glioblastoma cells adapt to hypoxic, perivascular, invasive, immunosuppressive, metabolically constrained, and treatment-injured microenvironments. We examined how chemokine signaling contributes to these adaptive behaviors. METHODS: We used the hallmarks of cancer as an organizing framework to synthesize preclinical, translational, and clinical evidence on chemokine circuits in glioblastoma. We evaluated recurrent mechanistic pathways, distinguished causal functions from context-dependent biomarker associations, and assessed their therapeutic relevance. RESULTS: Chemokines act primarily as spatial and stress-responsive regulators rather than initiating oncogenic drivers. Recurrent circuits include CXCL12-CXCR4 in vascular repair, invasion, and stem-like persistence; CCL2 and CCL7 signaling through CCR2 in suppressive myeloid recruitment and metabolic-immune remodeling; CCL5-CCR5 in perivascular protection, invasion, and DNA-damage tolerance; and CXCL8 signaling through CXCR1 and CXCR2 in angiogenesis, immune evasion, and therapy-induced plasticity. Most chemokine-directed strategies remain preclinical or early translational. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic development should prioritize biomarker-defined dependencies and appropriately timed combinations that disrupt selected chemokine-dependent interactions within specific biological and treatment contexts. Clinical translation will require verification of target engagement, disruption of the relevant cellular interactions, and evidence that chemokine modulation improves treatment response or delays recurrence.

Journal of Neuro-OncologyVol. 179(2)
Northwestern University (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Chemokine receptors and signaling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.