Ghost Rates Under the No Surprises Act: How Insurer Calculations Artificially Lower the Qualifying Payment Amount

The United States No Surprises Act removed patients from many payment disputes between nonparticipating clinicians and insurers while giving substantial influence to the qualifying payment amount (QPA) calculated by the insurer. This editorial examines whether a federally authorized payment benchmark calculated by the party responsible for payment, using data unavailable to the opposing party, can satisfy basic requirements of legitimacy, reproducibility, and accountability. On August 11, 2026, the en banc United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the challenged federal methodology was inconsistent with the statute because it required the inclusion of nonnegotiated "ghost rates." The court concluded that these rates produced artificially low QPAs. Federal independent dispute resolution data published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for the third and fourth quarters of 2025 show that providers prevailed in 84% of determinations that were fully contested and did not involve default, and that selected offers exceeded the QPA in approximately 87% of reported comparisons. These results do not establish that every provider offer was reasonable or that ghost rates explain every award. They demonstrate the need for transparent benchmark construction. We recommend disclosure of QPA methodology and rate populations, confidential access by independent auditors to rate-level data, and independent reproduction of disputed QPAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.115212
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ghost Rates Under the No Surprises Act: How Insurer Calculations Artificially Lower the Qualifying Payment Amount

Michael Risin, Anthony N. Dardano, Andrew Mark Klapper, Martha Denavea et al.
Cureus
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Ghost Rates Under the No Surprises Act: How Insurer Calculations Artificially Lower the Qualifying Payment Amount

Michael Risin, Anthony N. Dardano, Andrew Mark Klapper, Martha Denavea, Taylor Florio
article en

Abstract

The United States No Surprises Act removed patients from many payment disputes between nonparticipating clinicians and insurers while giving substantial influence to the qualifying payment amount (QPA) calculated by the insurer. This editorial examines whether a federally authorized payment benchmark calculated by the party responsible for payment, using data unavailable to the opposing party, can satisfy basic requirements of legitimacy, reproducibility, and accountability. On August 11, 2026, the en banc United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the challenged federal methodology was inconsistent with the statute because it required the inclusion of nonnegotiated "ghost rates." The court concluded that these rates produced artificially low QPAs. Federal independent dispute resolution data published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for the third and fourth quarters of 2025 show that providers prevailed in 84% of determinations that were fully contested and did not involve default, and that selected offers exceeded the QPA in approximately 87% of reported comparisons. These results do not establish that every provider offer was reasonable or that ghost rates explain every award. They demonstrate the need for transparent benchmark construction. We recommend disclosure of QPA methodology and rate populations, confidential access by independent auditors to rate-level data, and independent reproduction of disputed QPAs.

CureusVol. 18(8)
Floridian Research Institute (US), Delray Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ghost Rates Under the No Surprises Act: How Insurer Calculations Artificially Lower the Qualifying Payment Amount — Michael Risin, Anthony N. Dardano, et al. · Cureus (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS