Radargrammetric 3D Positioning of Pseudo Corner-Reflector Scatterers in KOMPSAT-5 Stacks with Per-Target Conditioning Diagnostics

Spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) needs point-like reference targets for co-registration, calibration, and absolute geolocation, but real corner reflectors (CRs) exist only at a few dedicated sites. We present a detection and three-dimensional (3D) positioning pipeline for naturally occurring corner-reflector-like (pseudo-CR) scatterers in KOMPSAT-5 stacks, combining constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detection ranked by local contrast rather than absolute power, a multi-scale template bank, multi-look range-Doppler bundle triangulation, and a per-target conditioning diagnostic vector. At the nine-CR Mongolia calibration field, all nine are recovered, with a mean horizontal error of 1.37 m and a mean 3D error of 2.01 m. At a CR-absent suburban site in Suncheon, Republic of Korea, 18 scenes yield 39,822 clusters, 26,659 of which pass the conditioning gate. Over 16 response-enriched poles retained by author adjudication, the difference to the nearest conditioning-filtered cluster averages 3.19 m horizontally and 1.45 m vertically relative to the surveyed pole base. Because part of that set was selected after inspecting preliminary responses, these are conditional nearest-cluster agreements, not verified target accuracies, and no detection probability is claimed. In an exploratory comparison on the same set, contrast ranking retains more evaluation targets than power ranking at equal budgets, 16 against 9 of 16. Removing robust weighting and pruning degrades the mean Mongolia 3D error to 7.39 m; the DEM prior is non-critical, whereas the clustering radius is consequential in the dense pole field, with the count within 20 m falling from 16 to 9 as the radius grows from 15 m to 30 m. In a leave-scene-out check, 85.8% of 254 evaluable clusters persist in a scene excluded from their solutions, against 35.2% of 270 evaluable random positions: a complete-case enrichment of 78%, or 53–82% under cross-arm worst-case imputation of the unevaluable targets; neither estimate measures catalogue precision. Limited KOMPSAT-5 stacks can therefore yield few-metre nearest-cluster agreement at selected pole locations where stable multi-scene responses form.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18172889
Primary Topic
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radargrammetric 3D Positioning of Pseudo Corner-Reflector Scatterers in KOMPSAT-5 Stacks with Per-Target Conditioning Diagnostics

Hyoseong Lee, Dongyeob Han, Dochul Yang
Remote Sensing
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
article

Radargrammetric 3D Positioning of Pseudo Corner-Reflector Scatterers in KOMPSAT-5 Stacks with Per-Target Conditioning Diagnostics

Hyoseong Lee, Dongyeob Han, Dochul Yang
article en

Abstract

Spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) needs point-like reference targets for co-registration, calibration, and absolute geolocation, but real corner reflectors (CRs) exist only at a few dedicated sites. We present a detection and three-dimensional (3D) positioning pipeline for naturally occurring corner-reflector-like (pseudo-CR) scatterers in KOMPSAT-5 stacks, combining constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detection ranked by local contrast rather than absolute power, a multi-scale template bank, multi-look range-Doppler bundle triangulation, and a per-target conditioning diagnostic vector. At the nine-CR Mongolia calibration field, all nine are recovered, with a mean horizontal error of 1.37 m and a mean 3D error of 2.01 m. At a CR-absent suburban site in Suncheon, Republic of Korea, 18 scenes yield 39,822 clusters, 26,659 of which pass the conditioning gate. Over 16 response-enriched poles retained by author adjudication, the difference to the nearest conditioning-filtered cluster averages 3.19 m horizontally and 1.45 m vertically relative to the surveyed pole base. Because part of that set was selected after inspecting preliminary responses, these are conditional nearest-cluster agreements, not verified target accuracies, and no detection probability is claimed. In an exploratory comparison on the same set, contrast ranking retains more evaluation targets than power ranking at equal budgets, 16 against 9 of 16. Removing robust weighting and pruning degrades the mean Mongolia 3D error to 7.39 m; the DEM prior is non-critical, whereas the clustering radius is consequential in the dense pole field, with the count within 20 m falling from 16 to 9 as the radius grows from 15 m to 30 m. In a leave-scene-out check, 85.8% of 254 evaluable clusters persist in a scene excluded from their solutions, against 35.2% of 270 evaluable random positions: a complete-case enrichment of 78%, or 53–82% under cross-arm worst-case imputation of the unevaluable targets; neither estimate measures catalogue precision. Limited KOMPSAT-5 stacks can therefore yield few-metre nearest-cluster agreement at selected pole locations where stable multi-scene responses form.

Remote SensingVol. 18(17)
Chonnam National University (KR), Sunchon National University (KR), Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KR)
Korea Aerospace Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.