Comparative evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration of AH plus, bioactive root canal sealer, and an experimental bioactive glass-based bioceramic sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy: An in vitro study

Abstract Introduction: Three-dimensional seal of the root canal improvises the endodontic outcomes. Recent trend has shown influential outcomes with single-cone bioceramic sealers. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate and compare the dentinal tubule penetration of AH plus, BioRoot root canal sealer (RCS), and an experimental bioactive glass-based bioceramic sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Materials and Methods: A total of 135 extracted human mandibular premolars with single canals were prepared using ProTaper Gold rotary files up to size F3. The samples were randomly divided into three groups ( n = 45 each): Group 1– AH plus, Group 2 – BioRoot RCS, and Group 3 – experimental bioactive glass-based bioceramic sealer. Each sealer was mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B dye to enable fluorescent visualization and applied using the matched-taper single-cone obturation technique. The specimens were stored for 7 days at 37°C in 100% humidity, then sectioned at 2 mm, 5 mm, and 8 mm levels from the apex. The maximum depth of sealer penetration into dentinal tubules was measured using CLSM. Results: The experimental bioactive glass-based bioceramic sealer demonstrated significantly greater dentinal tubule penetration at all three levels compared with BioRoot RCS and AH plus ( P < 0.05). BioRoot RCS showed moderate penetration, whereas AH plus exhibited the least. The apical third displayed the lowest penetration values across all the groups, while the coronal third showed the highest. Conclusion: Incorporation of bioactive glass into a bioceramic sealer significantly enhanced dentinal tubule penetration compared with conventional sealers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_275_25
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration of AH plus, bioactive root canal sealer, and an experimental bioactive glass-based bioceramic sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy: An in vitro study

Surendar Ramamoorthi, Pradeep Solete, Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja, Ahmed El-Kabbaney et al.
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Comparative evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration of AH plus, bioactive root canal sealer, and an experimental bioactive glass-based bioceramic sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy: An in vitro study

Surendar Ramamoorthi, Pradeep Solete, Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja, Ahmed El-Kabbaney, Nishitha Arun, Poulomi Guha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Three-dimensional seal of the root canal improvises the endodontic outcomes. Recent trend has shown influential outcomes with single-cone bioceramic sealers. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate and compare the dentinal tubule penetration of AH plus, BioRoot root canal sealer (RCS), and an experimental bioactive glass-based bioceramic sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Materials and Methods: A total of 135 extracted human mandibular premolars with single canals were prepared using ProTaper Gold rotary files up to size F3. The samples were randomly divided into three groups ( n = 45 each): Group 1– AH plus, Group 2 – BioRoot RCS, and Group 3 – experimental bioactive glass-based bioceramic sealer. Each sealer was mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B dye to enable fluorescent visualization and applied using the matched-taper single-cone obturation technique. The specimens were stored for 7 days at 37°C in 100% humidity, then sectioned at 2 mm, 5 mm, and 8 mm levels from the apex. The maximum depth of sealer penetration into dentinal tubules was measured using CLSM. Results: The experimental bioactive glass-based bioceramic sealer demonstrated significantly greater dentinal tubule penetration at all three levels compared with BioRoot RCS and AH plus ( P < 0.05). BioRoot RCS showed moderate penetration, whereas AH plus exhibited the least. The apical third displayed the lowest penetration values across all the groups, while the coronal third showed the highest. Conclusion: Incorporation of bioactive glass into a bioceramic sealer significantly enhanced dentinal tubule penetration compared with conventional sealers.

Saudi Endodontic JournalVol. 16(3)
Qassim University (SA), Mansoura University (EG), G Pulla Reddy Dental College & Hospital (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.