Embedding legal text complexity

Abstract This study examines the linguistic complexity that characterises Italian administrative texts. In particular, it focuses on the Risposte (responses) issued by the Agenzia delle Entrate (Italian Revenue Agency). Adopting a distant reading approach and decomposing linguistic complexity into a range of measures across different levels of linguistic analysis, the study conducts a quantitative examination of a large corpus of Risposte . The analysis shows that texts produced by the administration are more complex than other types of texts, specifically a control corpus of Wikipedia entries for tax law, and that, within these administrative documents, the most relevant section is also the most linguistically complex. The findings highlight risks to accessibility and advocate for clearer institutional communication to promote linguistic equity and textual accessibility. The linguistic complexity of administrative and regulatory texts can, in fact, hinder citizens’ access to justice and their ability to comply with the binding requirements imposed by the administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2025-0042
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embedding legal text complexity

Alessandro Buttinelli
European Journal of Applied Linguistics
Text Readability and Simplification
article

Embedding legal text complexity

Alessandro Buttinelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the linguistic complexity that characterises Italian administrative texts. In particular, it focuses on the Risposte (responses) issued by the Agenzia delle Entrate (Italian Revenue Agency). Adopting a distant reading approach and decomposing linguistic complexity into a range of measures across different levels of linguistic analysis, the study conducts a quantitative examination of a large corpus of Risposte . The analysis shows that texts produced by the administration are more complex than other types of texts, specifically a control corpus of Wikipedia entries for tax law, and that, within these administrative documents, the most relevant section is also the most linguistically complex. The findings highlight risks to accessibility and advocate for clearer institutional communication to promote linguistic equity and textual accessibility. The linguistic complexity of administrative and regulatory texts can, in fact, hinder citizens’ access to justice and their ability to comply with the binding requirements imposed by the administration.

European Journal of Applied Linguistics
University of Turin (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Text Readability and Simplification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Embedding legal text complexity — Alessandro Buttinelli · European Journal of Applied Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS