Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure and Continuous Albuterol for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations

Importance: A substantial knowledge gap remains in understanding the specific role bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) in the emergency department (ED) for acute pediatric asthma exacerbations. Objective: To examine whether the early application of BPAP in the ED for acute pediatric asthma exacerbations reduces duration of critical care management time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled children between 5 and 17 years of age presenting to a single-center, quaternary, referral pediatric ED with an acute asthma exacerbation, a pediatric respiratory assessment measure of at least 4 (moderate severity), and prescribed continuous albuterol therapy between June 1, 2023, and May 31, 2025. Intervention: Participants were randomized to either the intervention arm (BPAP) or control arm (sham BPAP, which delivers minimal pressure) for 4 hours. Neither the health care practitioners nor participants were aware of study arm allocation. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome measure was duration of continuous albuterol therapy. A sequential design with a planned interim analysis for futility and superiority was used, and a t test compared mean duration of continuous β-agonist therapy under an intention-to-treat approach. Results: Sixty-six study participants (median [IQR] age, 10.2 [6.8-13.2] years; 35 [53.0%] male; 1 [1.5%] American Indian or Alaskan, 1 [1.5%] Asian, 21 [31.8%] Black or African American, 21 [31.8%] White, and 22 [33.3%] other race) were included in the primary analysis, with a mean (SD) pediatric respiratory assessment measure of 5.2 (1.9), indicating moderate disease. At the 50% interim analysis, participants in the BPAP study arm received a mean (SD) of 8.3 (8.5) hours of continuous albuterol vs 8.7 (10.0) hours in the control group (mean difference, -0.5 hours; 95% CI, -5.0 to 4.1 hours; P = .84). The study was stopped due to meeting a priori bounds for futility at the 50% interim analysis. No deaths, invasive mechanical ventilation, air leak syndrome, or aspiration pneumonia were observed in either study arm. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of early initiation of BPAP in the ED, no clinically significant decrease in the duration of continuous β-agonist therapy in pediatric patients presenting with moderate asthma exacerbations was observed. Additional open-label studies in a more severe asthma cohort are required to better inform clinical practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05848115.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.30627
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure and Continuous Albuterol for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations

Patrick T. Wilson, Stanley J. Szefler, Lilliam Ambroggio, John T. Brinton et al.
JAMA Network Open
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure and Continuous Albuterol for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations

Patrick T. Wilson, Stanley J. Szefler, Lilliam Ambroggio, John T. Brinton, Melisa Tanverdi
article en

Abstract

Importance: A substantial knowledge gap remains in understanding the specific role bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) in the emergency department (ED) for acute pediatric asthma exacerbations. Objective: To examine whether the early application of BPAP in the ED for acute pediatric asthma exacerbations reduces duration of critical care management time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled children between 5 and 17 years of age presenting to a single-center, quaternary, referral pediatric ED with an acute asthma exacerbation, a pediatric respiratory assessment measure of at least 4 (moderate severity), and prescribed continuous albuterol therapy between June 1, 2023, and May 31, 2025. Intervention: Participants were randomized to either the intervention arm (BPAP) or control arm (sham BPAP, which delivers minimal pressure) for 4 hours. Neither the health care practitioners nor participants were aware of study arm allocation. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome measure was duration of continuous albuterol therapy. A sequential design with a planned interim analysis for futility and superiority was used, and a t test compared mean duration of continuous β-agonist therapy under an intention-to-treat approach. Results: Sixty-six study participants (median [IQR] age, 10.2 [6.8-13.2] years; 35 [53.0%] male; 1 [1.5%] American Indian or Alaskan, 1 [1.5%] Asian, 21 [31.8%] Black or African American, 21 [31.8%] White, and 22 [33.3%] other race) were included in the primary analysis, with a mean (SD) pediatric respiratory assessment measure of 5.2 (1.9), indicating moderate disease. At the 50% interim analysis, participants in the BPAP study arm received a mean (SD) of 8.3 (8.5) hours of continuous albuterol vs 8.7 (10.0) hours in the control group (mean difference, -0.5 hours; 95% CI, -5.0 to 4.1 hours; P = .84). The study was stopped due to meeting a priori bounds for futility at the 50% interim analysis. No deaths, invasive mechanical ventilation, air leak syndrome, or aspiration pneumonia were observed in either study arm. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of early initiation of BPAP in the ED, no clinically significant decrease in the duration of continuous β-agonist therapy in pediatric patients presenting with moderate asthma exacerbations was observed. Additional open-label studies in a more severe asthma cohort are required to better inform clinical practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05848115.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(8)
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.