Adaptive Fusion of Multiple Land-Cover Products for Improved Spatial Representation of Key Land Classes in Central Asia

Reliable cropland, forestland, and grassland maps support resource assessment and ecological management in arid and semi-arid Central Asia. Existing land-cover products often delineate these classes differently, vary in reliability across classes and locations, and may share the same errors even when they agree. This study formulates multi-product fusion as a pixel- and class-specific reliability decision problem. To address this problem, we propose a reliability-adaptive fusion framework, the Discrepancy-Aware Reliability-Adaptive Fusion Network (DRAFNet), using 2020 maps from three global 30 m land-cover products—FROM-GLC Plus, GLC-FCS30D, and GlobeLand30—and variables representing aridity, temperature, precipitation, elevation, and slope. Unlike fixed-weight fusion methods and segmentation models that use the source products only as input channels, DRAFNet retains the categorical source decisions and adjusts each contribution according to its estimated reliability for the assigned class and location. Weight removed from an unreliable source is transferred to a residual expert, which provides an alternative prediction when the source products are unreliable or share the same error. Voting entropy and geo-environmental variables provide contextual information for this decision. On independent test samples from the five Central Asian countries, DRAFNet achieved an overall accuracy (OA) of 0.8275, a Kappa coefficient of 0.7698, a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 0.7046, and a macro-averaged F1 score (Macro F1) of 0.8241. These values were 0.95–1.38 percentage points higher than those of U-Net++, the strongest benchmark. Local comparisons indicated more coherent spatial patterns and clearer boundaries in areas of pronounced disagreement. The mean and median absolute log-ratio deviations from area statistics reported by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) were 0.618 and 0.450, respectively, both lower than those of the source products. These results support land-resource assessment and ecological management in Central Asia.