White adjacency as borrowed safety: a cultural technology of organisational whiteness

White adjacency is often described as a racial gradient partial proximity to whiteness afforded to some racialised subjects. This paper reconceptualises adjacency as borrowed safety: a fragile, conditional form of organisational protection that stabilises whiteness while disciplining those who appear to benefit from it. Drawing on Black studies, critical race theory, and organisational scholarship, I argue that borrowed safety is not an individual attribute but a cultural technology through which organisations unevenly distribute credibility, belonging, and protection. Through this lens, proximity to whiteness becomes a mechanism of governance, enabling institutions to incorporate certain racialised workers without granting full legitimacy. I theorise three mechanisms borrowed credibility, borrowed belonging, and borrowed protection to show how adjacency operates simultaneously as cushion and constraint. By reframing white adjacency as an organisational practice, the paper offers a sharper vocabulary for understanding racialised power, conditional inclusion, and the subtle architectures through which whiteness maintains itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Identities
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2026.2723760
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

White adjacency as borrowed safety: a cultural technology of organisational whiteness

Abigal Muchecheti
Social Identities
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

White adjacency as borrowed safety: a cultural technology of organisational whiteness

Abigal Muchecheti
article en

Abstract

White adjacency is often described as a racial gradient partial proximity to whiteness afforded to some racialised subjects. This paper reconceptualises adjacency as borrowed safety: a fragile, conditional form of organisational protection that stabilises whiteness while disciplining those who appear to benefit from it. Drawing on Black studies, critical race theory, and organisational scholarship, I argue that borrowed safety is not an individual attribute but a cultural technology through which organisations unevenly distribute credibility, belonging, and protection. Through this lens, proximity to whiteness becomes a mechanism of governance, enabling institutions to incorporate certain racialised workers without granting full legitimacy. I theorise three mechanisms borrowed credibility, borrowed belonging, and borrowed protection to show how adjacency operates simultaneously as cushion and constraint. By reframing white adjacency as an organisational practice, the paper offers a sharper vocabulary for understanding racialised power, conditional inclusion, and the subtle architectures through which whiteness maintains itself.

Social Identities
Faringdon Day Hospital (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.