The effect of augmented protein intake on nitrogen balance: A nested cohort study of the TARGET protein trial

Purpose The impact of augmenting enteral protein delivery on nitrogen balance, urea generation, and kidney function in critically ill patients remains poorly defined. This study aimed to investigate these effects in a nested cohort within the TARGET Protein trial. Methods We conducted a single-center study nested within a cluster randomized crossover trial. Consecutive patients were enrolled during either the usual protein intake period ( n = 52) or the augmented protein intake period ( n = 55). Nitrogen balance, its components, plasma urea concentrations, and urea nitrogen accumulation were compared between groups. Multivariable analyses identified factors independently associated with nitrogen balance and incident acute kidney injury (AKI). A causal mediation analysis was performed to assess whether the effect of augmented protein delivery on urea concentrations was mediated through incident AKI. Results From day 1 to day 7, mean protein intake was 0.84 ± 0.73 g·kg −1 ·day −1 in the usual-protein group and 1.35 ± 0.94 g·kg −1 ·day −1 in the augmented-protein group. Patients receiving augmented protein achieved a less negative nitrogen balance than those receiving usual protein (mean difference, +5 g per day; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 10; P = 0.033), driven by greater nitrogen intake (mean difference, +7 g per day; 95% CI, 5 to 10; P < 0.001). Independent predictors of nitrogen balance were ideal body weight (−0.18 g.kg −1 ; 95% CI, −0.35 to −0.01; P = 0.040), AKI at ICU admission (+4.7 g; 95% CI, 0.10 to 9.3; P = 0.046), and allocation to augmented protein therapy (+5.1 g; 95% CI, 0.43 to 9.7; P = 0.033). Compared with usual protein delivery, augmented protein delivery resulted in higher plasma urea concentrations (median, 14 vs. 11 mmol/L) and greater urea nitrogen accumulation (+3 g; 95% CI, 1.0 to 6.0; P = 0.035). Approximately 60% of the additional positive nitrogen balance was accounted for by urea generation. Among patients without AKI at ICU admission, augmented protein delivery was independently associated with incident AKI (odds ratio, 4.79; 95% CI, 1.14 to 26.4; P = 0.046). In mediation analyses, most of the increase in urea concentrations associated with augmented protein delivery was attributable to a direct effect rather than mediation through incident AKI. Conclusions In critically ill patients, augmented protein delivery resulted in a less negative nitrogen balance but substantially increased urea generation and plasma urea concentrations. These findings suggest that a substantial proportion of additional protein intake may be directed toward nitrogen waste production rather than net anabolic utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Care
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2026.155706
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of augmented protein intake on nitrogen balance: A nested cohort study of the TARGET protein trial

Jonathan Nübel, Suzie Ferrie, Sofia Spano, Jeffrey Presneill et al.
Journal of Critical Care
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

The effect of augmented protein intake on nitrogen balance: A nested cohort study of the TARGET protein trial

Jonathan Nübel, Suzie Ferrie, Sofia Spano, Jeffrey Presneill, Nima Kakho, Yukiko Hikasa, Patricia Williams, Sandra Peake, Lee‐anne S. Chapple, Anis Chaba, Atthaphong Phongphithakchai, An Tran‐Duy, Matthew J. Maiden, Leah Peck, Alessandro Caroli, Akinori Maeda, Glenn Eastwood, Lu Zhong, Emma J. Ridley, Mark E. Finnis, Helen Young, Adam M. Deane, Nuanprae Kitisin, Matthew J. Summers, Paul J. Young, Stephanie N. O'Connor, Rinaldo Bellomo
article en

Abstract

Purpose The impact of augmenting enteral protein delivery on nitrogen balance, urea generation, and kidney function in critically ill patients remains poorly defined. This study aimed to investigate these effects in a nested cohort within the TARGET Protein trial. Methods We conducted a single-center study nested within a cluster randomized crossover trial. Consecutive patients were enrolled during either the usual protein intake period ( n = 52) or the augmented protein intake period ( n = 55). Nitrogen balance, its components, plasma urea concentrations, and urea nitrogen accumulation were compared between groups. Multivariable analyses identified factors independently associated with nitrogen balance and incident acute kidney injury (AKI). A causal mediation analysis was performed to assess whether the effect of augmented protein delivery on urea concentrations was mediated through incident AKI. Results From day 1 to day 7, mean protein intake was 0.84 ± 0.73 g·kg −1 ·day −1 in the usual-protein group and 1.35 ± 0.94 g·kg −1 ·day −1 in the augmented-protein group. Patients receiving augmented protein achieved a less negative nitrogen balance than those receiving usual protein (mean difference, +5 g per day; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 10; P = 0.033), driven by greater nitrogen intake (mean difference, +7 g per day; 95% CI, 5 to 10; P < 0.001). Independent predictors of nitrogen balance were ideal body weight (−0.18 g.kg −1 ; 95% CI, −0.35 to −0.01; P = 0.040), AKI at ICU admission (+4.7 g; 95% CI, 0.10 to 9.3; P = 0.046), and allocation to augmented protein therapy (+5.1 g; 95% CI, 0.43 to 9.7; P = 0.033). Compared with usual protein delivery, augmented protein delivery resulted in higher plasma urea concentrations (median, 14 vs. 11 mmol/L) and greater urea nitrogen accumulation (+3 g; 95% CI, 1.0 to 6.0; P = 0.035). Approximately 60% of the additional positive nitrogen balance was accounted for by urea generation. Among patients without AKI at ICU admission, augmented protein delivery was independently associated with incident AKI (odds ratio, 4.79; 95% CI, 1.14 to 26.4; P = 0.046). In mediation analyses, most of the increase in urea concentrations associated with augmented protein delivery was attributable to a direct effect rather than mediation through incident AKI. Conclusions In critically ill patients, augmented protein delivery resulted in a less negative nitrogen balance but substantially increased urea generation and plasma urea concentrations. These findings suggest that a substantial proportion of additional protein intake may be directed toward nitrogen waste production rather than net anabolic utilization.

Journal of Critical CareVol. 97
The University of Sydney (AU), Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Siriraj Hospital (TH), The University of Melbourne (AU), Heidelberg University (DE), Geelong Hospital (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Austin Hospital (AU), Wellington Hospital (NZ), Monash Medical Centre (AU), The Alfred Hospital (AU), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Sorbonne Université (FR), Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (AU), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU), Medical Research Institute of New Zealand (NZ), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE), Melbourne Health (AU), Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel (DE), Hôpital Tenon (FR), Monash University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.